Abstract:Cultivating a safe and open culture of communication and mentoring new graduates to speak up will benefit patient safety now and in the future by helping to retain committed patient advocates who could mentor future generations.
“…Chandler, [10] Law and Chan [11] and this study found that fresh nursing graduates have high expectations from themselves and others as they are expected to take up their new role and adapt to a new environment in a short period of time. Expectations cause an increased level of anxiety as they worry about being gossiped about or criticised by colleagues which echoes Kelly & Ahern, [9] Morales [22] and Teoh, Pua & Chan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] They expect to adapt and learn new roles immediately; they feel frustrated when they fail to meet their own or others' expectations. [3,5,10,11] They also fear duty handover and hesitate to speak up when there is a need to communicate with physicians, senior nurses, patients and relatives. [3,8,11,12] In addition, they are discouraged when they find variance between theory and practice in clinical contexts which causes them a lack of confidence and poor clinical performance, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] given their lack of sufficient knowledge, skills, and experience to bridge the gap.…”
Objective: The shortage of nurses is an overwhelming problem worldwide. Numerous studies indicate that fresh nursing graduates encounter many challenges in their first year after graduation. These difficulties affect their psychological health and influence their perseverance which results in a high resignation rate. Hong Kong is not an exceptional case; therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the challenges encountered by fresh nursing graduates during the transition period in order to provide insights to academics and clinical administrators in order to facilitate the transition and alleviate the negative impacts, thus increasing the retention rate. Methods: This was a qualitative study and eight new nursing graduates (M = 4; F = 4) from the same local higher education institute were interviewed individually. Thematic coding was used to analyse the data. Results: Finally, nine themes were identified including eight areas of challenges and one common attribute. Workload, lack of knowledge, communication, expectation, change of role, working atmosphere, support and a blame/complaint culture are the common areas of challenges that they encounter in the transitional period. Furthermore, this study also found that new nursing graduates possess a common attribute, i.e. positive personal attitude which seems able to enhance their perseverance in this period. Conclusions: The identified themes are interrelated and all the stakeholders should join together and form a cycle of continuous improvement in order to improve the nursing programme and clinical supports to the fresh nursing graduates.
“…Chandler, [10] Law and Chan [11] and this study found that fresh nursing graduates have high expectations from themselves and others as they are expected to take up their new role and adapt to a new environment in a short period of time. Expectations cause an increased level of anxiety as they worry about being gossiped about or criticised by colleagues which echoes Kelly & Ahern, [9] Morales [22] and Teoh, Pua & Chan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] They expect to adapt and learn new roles immediately; they feel frustrated when they fail to meet their own or others' expectations. [3,5,10,11] They also fear duty handover and hesitate to speak up when there is a need to communicate with physicians, senior nurses, patients and relatives. [3,8,11,12] In addition, they are discouraged when they find variance between theory and practice in clinical contexts which causes them a lack of confidence and poor clinical performance, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] given their lack of sufficient knowledge, skills, and experience to bridge the gap.…”
Objective: The shortage of nurses is an overwhelming problem worldwide. Numerous studies indicate that fresh nursing graduates encounter many challenges in their first year after graduation. These difficulties affect their psychological health and influence their perseverance which results in a high resignation rate. Hong Kong is not an exceptional case; therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the challenges encountered by fresh nursing graduates during the transition period in order to provide insights to academics and clinical administrators in order to facilitate the transition and alleviate the negative impacts, thus increasing the retention rate. Methods: This was a qualitative study and eight new nursing graduates (M = 4; F = 4) from the same local higher education institute were interviewed individually. Thematic coding was used to analyse the data. Results: Finally, nine themes were identified including eight areas of challenges and one common attribute. Workload, lack of knowledge, communication, expectation, change of role, working atmosphere, support and a blame/complaint culture are the common areas of challenges that they encounter in the transitional period. Furthermore, this study also found that new nursing graduates possess a common attribute, i.e. positive personal attitude which seems able to enhance their perseverance in this period. Conclusions: The identified themes are interrelated and all the stakeholders should join together and form a cycle of continuous improvement in order to improve the nursing programme and clinical supports to the fresh nursing graduates.
“…The recommendations were classified under the following themes: respect and honesty; a health service that is well led; competent health-care professionals; the safety of care; care of an appropriate standard; public involvement through empowerment; and the care of children. Although there was no explicit recommendation on whistleblowing, a number of recommendations foreshadowed some of those of later reports, such as 'a duty of candour' to patients (recommendation 33), a framework of regulation independent of government (recommendations [39][40], doctors' Code of Professional Practice incorporated in the contract of employment (recommendation 45), a regulatory body, and professional code of practice for health-care managers (recommendation 91), a national reporting system (recommendations [109][110][111][112], and incentives to encourage the reporting of sentinel events (recommendations 113-118).…”
Section: Consequences For the Nhsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was no explicit recommendation on whistleblowing, a number of recommendations foreshadowed some of those of later reports, such as 'a duty of candour' to patients (recommendation 33), a framework of regulation independent of government (recommendations 39 and 40), doctors' Code of Professional Practice incorporated in the contract of employment (recommendation 45), a regulatory body, and a professional code of practice for health-care managers (recommendation 91), a national reporting system (recommendations [109][110][111][112], and incentives to encourage the reporting of sentinel events (recommendations [113][114][115][116][117][118]. However, more generally, stress was placed on changing the 'culture of the NHS'.…”
Section: Consequences For the Nhsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85,87,90,91,102 This advocacy role has been recognised as a crucial part of a nurses' training, 109,122,124 and perceived as fundamental to helping nurses recognise when care is poor. Ion et al 99 note the natural human tendency to describe oneself in the most positive light, leading whistleblowers to claim to be strong characters, whereas non-whistleblowers blame factors outside their control for their failure to report, perhaps suggesting that, at some level of consciousness, nurses understand and believe that their primary responsibility is to the patient.…”
Section: Personal Traits and Characteristicsmentioning
Background
There is compelling evidence to suggest that some (or even many) NHS staff feel unable to speak up, and that even when they do, their organisation may respond inappropriately.
Objectives
The specific project objectives were (1) to explore the academic and grey literature on whistleblowing and related concepts, identifying the key theoretical frameworks that can inform an understanding of whistleblowing; (2) to synthesise the empirical evidence about the processes that facilitate or impede employees raising concerns; (3) to examine the legal framework(s) underpinning whistleblowing; (4) to distil the lessons for whistleblowing policies from the findings of Inquiries into failings of NHS care; (5) to ascertain the views of stakeholders about the development of whistleblowing policies; and (6) to develop practical guidance for future policy-making in this area.
Methods
The study comprised four distinct but interlocking strands: (1) a series of narrative literature reviews, (2) an analysis of the legal issues related to whistleblowing, (3) a review of formal Inquiries related to previous failings of NHS care and (4) interviews with key informants.
Results
Policy prescriptions often conceive the issue of raising concerns as a simple choice between deciding to ‘blow the whistle’ and remaining silent. Yet research suggests that health-care professionals may raise concerns internally within the organisation in more informal ways before utilising whistleblowing processes. Potential areas for development here include the oversight of whistleblowing from an independent agency; early-stage protection for whistleblowers; an examination of the role of incentives in encouraging whistleblowing; and improvements to criminal law to protect whistleblowers. Perhaps surprisingly, there is little discussion of, or recommendations concerning, whistleblowing across the previous NHS Inquiry reports.
Limitations
Although every effort was made to capture all relevant papers and documents in the various reviews using comprehensive search strategies, some may have been missed as indexing in this area is challenging. We interviewed only a small number of people in the key informant interviews, and our findings may have been different if we had included a larger sample or informants with different roles and responsibilities.
Conclusions
Current policy prescriptions that seek to develop better whistleblowing policies and nurture open reporting cultures are in need of more evidence. Although we set out a wide range of issues, it is beyond our remit to convert these concerns into specific recommendations: that is a process that needs to be led from elsewhere, and in partnership with the service. There is also still much to learn regarding this important area of health policy, and we have highlighted a number of important gaps in knowledge that are in need of more sustained research.
Future work
A key area for future research is to explore whistleblowing as an unfolding, situated and interactional process and not just a one-off act by an identifiable whistleblower. In particular, we need more evidence and insights into the tendency for senior managers not to hear, accept or act on concerns about care raised by employees.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Issue Addressed: Early primary school children with diabetes require adult support for insulin therapy and primary school teachers often fulfil this health promotion role. Availability of support is inconsistent across Australia and insulin administration at school is avoided for some children. The aims of the study were to explore the experiences of Australian early primary school teachers who were supporting a student using intensive insulin therapy and to identify facilitators and implications of this support.
Method:A qualitative research design using narrative inquiry was utilised. Early primary school teachers (n = 11) from six Australian states/territories and across Government, Catholic and independent schools participated in semi-structured telephone interviews between August 2015 and May 2016. Narrative analysis was used to interpret the interview data.Results: Six narrative threads told a collective story of early primary school teachers' experience of supporting a student using intensive insulin therapy. The factors that facilitated support were: suitable class allocation, a transition process, and diabetes education and diabetes models of care. The implications of providing intensive insulin therapy support were legal considerations and burden of responsibility. The outcome was that all teachers supported intensive insulin therapy.
Conclusion:School teachers in this study had a pivotal role in promoting the health of students with type 1 diabetes. This role was often associated with anxiety and the burden of responsibility. Support strategies for teachers include formal diabetes skills training, ongoing assistance from both teacher's aides and Diabetes Educators, and greater understanding of the legal aspects of intensive insulin therapy support. The development of consistent health promotion policy for students with type 1 diabetes across all Australian schools is required.So what? Adopting the supportive strategies for teachers identified in this study will further promote the health of early primary school children with type 1 diabetes.
K E Y W O R D Schildren, chronic disease, diabetes, health education, health promoting schools | 241 MARKS et Al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.