The expected emotional benefits of influenza vaccination strongly affect pre-season intentions and subsequent vaccination among healthcare personnel

Thompson, Mark G.; Gaglani, Manjusha; Naleway, Allison L.; Ball, Sarah; Henkle, Emily; Sokolow, Leslie Z.; Brennan, Beth; Zhou, Hong; Foster, L. E.; Black, Carla L.; Kennedy, Erin D.; Bozeman, Sam; Grohskopf, Lisa A.; Shay, David K.

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.062

Cited by 43 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The median age of study participants was 43 years old and the majority were female, white, and non-Hispanic (see [7,9,10] and Supplemental Table). Our analyses focused on FARI episodes among 47 unvaccinated and 174 vaccinated HCP (Supplemental Figure).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, the small sample size prohibited adjustment for covariates such as age and resulted in low estimate precision. Second, it is unclear how previous IIV3 vaccinations and previous natural infections may have influenced our findings, especially given that most study vaccinees had been vaccinated before ( [7,10] and Supplemental Table). Petrie et al [6] may have observed much higher sensitivity among their unvaccinated adults because they were mostly IIV3 naïve.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Details of our study methodology have been previously published, including: study recruitment (from September to November 2010) and participant characteristics [7,8]; collection of blood at enrollment, ∼28 days post-vaccination (October to December 17, 2010), and ∼7 months after enrollment (May and June 2011) [9]; the documentation of vaccination status from integrated medical and employee records [7,10,11]; active surveillance for febrile acute respiratory illness (FARI; fever, feverishness, or chills and cough) [12,13] from December 18 2010 to April 30 2011; collection of three separate specimens using nasal, oropharyngeal, and nasopharyngeal swabs and testing each using US CDC's RT-PCR procedures [14]. Serum was tested by HI using standard procedures against the IIV3 components A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) (i.e., A[H1N1]pdm09) and A/Perth/16/2009-like H3N2 virus [9,15]; all of the influenza A viruses from our study were characterized as vaccine-like [9,15] similar to national trends that season [16].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reduced serologic sensitivity to influenza A virus illness among inactivated influenza vaccinees

Thompson

Gaglani

Naleway

et al. 2016

Vaccine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reduced serologic sensitivity to influenza A virus illness among inactivated influenza vaccinees

Thompson

Gaglani

Naleway

et al. 2016

Vaccine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Details on cohort recruitment have been presented previously (Thompson et al, 2012 Demographics and SES measures. The enrollment questionnaire included items on demographics and three indicators of objective SES: education, occupation, and street address, which was used to identify US census block (Table 1).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in self-rated health and subjective social status over time in a cohort of healthcare personnel

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As part of a prospective cohort study of 1354 female and 347 male healthcare personnel, we examined the stability of subjective social status over ~7 months and the prospective association between subjective social status and self-rated health status. Most (82%) subjective social status ratings were stable (within ±1 point). Lower baseline subjective social status among healthcare personnel was associated with more subsequent reports of fatigue and headache and worsening global self-rated health status. Healthcare personnel who placed themselves on the bottom half of the subjective social status ladder were four times more likely to experience a decline in global self-rated health status and half as likely to improve to excellent self-rated health status.

show abstract

“…Previous vaccine receipt, perceived effectiveness, and convenience have all been associated with vaccination [7-10]; with self-protection identified as the primary motivation [11]. Recently, vaccine uptake has been studied in specific populations of community-dwelling children and adults, such as those at higher risk for influenza [9-16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt in community dwelling adults and their children

Malosh

Ohmit

Petrie

et al. 2014

Vaccine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt are well studied in healthcare personnel, pregnant women, and the elderly. There has been substantially less research in community dwelling adults and children, and none among entire households. Many studies determine vaccination status by self-report or behavioral intention, outcomes susceptible to misclassification. Given that vaccine is recommended for everyone over six months, re-evaluating these factors is warranted. Methods The Household Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (HIVE) study is a prospective cohort of households with children. In 2010-2011, 549 adults representing 312 households completed surveys evaluating knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding influenza vaccination for themselves and their children. Using the health belief model (HBM) as a framework, we examined factors associated with documented seasonal influenza vaccine receipt using log-binomial regression models. Results In multivariate models, cues to action such as doctor recommendation, (RR 1.62, 95% CI:1.25-2.10), perceived benefits (RR 1.25, 95% CI:1.04-1.50), and perceived susceptibility (RR 1.21, 95% CI:1.03-1.42) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of vaccine receipt among adults while high perceived barriers were associated with decreased likelihood (RR 0.38, 95% CI:0.25-0.59). Similarly, parents reporting higher barriers were less likely (RR 0.58, 95% CI:0.42-0.79) and those perceiving greater benefits (RR 4.16, 95% CI:2.28-7.59) and severity (RR 1.13, 95% CI:1.00-1.27 were more likely to vaccinate their children. The observed effects of perceptions of susceptibility, severity, and benefits were more pronounced at low cues to action for children, as were the effects of perceptions of barriers and severity among adults. Conclusion Perceived benefits and barriers are most strongly associated with vaccine receipt. However, the effects of various factors were most pronounced in the absence of cues to action, which may be an important component of targeted interventions.

show abstract

The expected emotional benefits of influenza vaccination strongly affect pre-season intentions and subsequent vaccination among healthcare personnel

Abstract: The expected emotional benefits of vaccination strongly affect seasonal influenza vaccination among HCP, even after taking into account other attitudes, pre-season intentions, and prior vaccination history. These attitudes are promising targets for future vaccination campaigns.

Cited by 43 publications

References 44 publications

Reduced serologic sensitivity to influenza A virus illness among inactivated influenza vaccinees

Reduced serologic sensitivity to influenza A virus illness among inactivated influenza vaccinees

Changes in self-rated health and subjective social status over time in a cohort of healthcare personnel

Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt in community dwelling adults and their children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About