The Neolithic Demographic Transition and Its Consequences
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8539-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Expansions of Farming Societies and the Role of the Neolithic Demographic Transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that cultivation increased calorie availability which, combined with a reduction in energy expenditure resulting from sedentarization, led to increased energy availability for reproduction (8)(9)(10). As a result, although exact estimates vary, it has been argued that average population growth rates rose from <0.001% to ∼0.04% per year during the early Neolithic (6,8,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that cultivation increased calorie availability which, combined with a reduction in energy expenditure resulting from sedentarization, led to increased energy availability for reproduction (8)(9)(10). As a result, although exact estimates vary, it has been argued that average population growth rates rose from <0.001% to ∼0.04% per year during the early Neolithic (6,8,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of this view disagree on whether the major site of Khok Phanom Di in south-central Thailand represents complex maritime foragers, comparable to the Da But sites in North Vietnam (Higham this issue), or the early expansion of mainland Southeast Asian farmers (Bellwood and Oxenham 2008). Archaeological evidence for the spread of agriculture associated with the expansion of the Malayo-Polynesian branch of Austronesian, from the Taiwan region into Indo-Malaysia, is ambiguous (Bellwood 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On that basis, the MSEA Neolithic is thought to have commenced in the late third to early second millennium BC. There are two models for the development of Neolithic occupation in the region (Bellwood and Oxenham 2008;Higham 2011a: 1): the first is an expansionist model whereby farmers from the north moved into areas occupied by indigenous hunter-gatherers; the second prioritises the ability of indigenous groups to adopt cultivated subsistence and technological traits as Neolithic farmers entered the region.…”
Section: Neolithic Occupation In Mseamentioning
confidence: 99%