2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The expansion and performance of national newborn screening programmes for cystic fibrosis in Europe

Abstract: There has been a steady increase in national CF NBS programmes across Europe with variable strategies and outcomes that reflect the different approaches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
134
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
134
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, three national programmes in Europe do include extended gene sequencing (Netherlands, Norway and Poland) 14. While use of extended genotyping will improve specificity by picking up some cases with two disease-causing mutations, it will also lead to the diagnosis of more carriers and designation of more children as CFSPID with the inevitable dilemmas over further management 13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, three national programmes in Europe do include extended gene sequencing (Netherlands, Norway and Poland) 14. While use of extended genotyping will improve specificity by picking up some cases with two disease-causing mutations, it will also lead to the diagnosis of more carriers and designation of more children as CFSPID with the inevitable dilemmas over further management 13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Cystic Fibrosis Society has published consensus recommendations for CFSPID,3 but, nevertheless, there remain many unanswered questions, not least length of follow-up of an essentially healthy child. There are a variety of screening protocols and algorithms across the world, and a European survey published in 2016 found 16 different approaches in the 16 countries with national programmes 14. Perhaps this implies that the perfect programme does not exist, and while changes may be necessary (eg, to IRT cut-offs or number of gene mutations tested), they must first be evaluated carefully and be specific to the population being screened 14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cases are missed by CF newborn screening. Algorithms should strive for a sensitivity above 95% and a positive predictive value above 30% . The major side effect of CF newborn screening is detecting infants in whom the diagnosis CF cannot be made or excluded with certainty.…”
Section: From Diagnosis Via Symptoms To Cf Newborn Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of newborn screening (NBS) has increased widely, 1 because of proven nutritional benefits, improved pulmonary outcome and survival. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Identification of elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) is the first step defining a positive screen and, in most algorithms, precedes cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation analysis and diagnostic sweat testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%