2022
DOI: 10.1002/mlf2.12012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The expanding Asgard archaea and their elusive relationships with Eukarya

Abstract: The discovery of Asgard archaea and the exploration of their diversity over the last 6 years have deeply impacted the scientific community working on eukaryogenesis, rejuvenating an intense debate on the topology of the universal tree of life (uTol). Here, we discuss how this debate is impacted by two recent publications that expand the number of Asgard lineages and eukaryotic signature proteins (ESPs). We discuss some of the main difficulties that can impair the phylogenetic reconstructions of the uTol and su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The marker selection process is a critical step in phylogenetic analysis since a single misleading protein can completely change the result obtained by the concatenation of dozens of proteins. This has been shown, for instance, in the case of elongation factor EF2 of two lineages (out of 18) of Asgard archaea that did not branch with other Asgard EF2 but as a sister group of eukaryotes, probably because of ancient LGT between these Asgard and proto‐eukaryotes 22,54 . Removal of this protein from the original data set of 36 markers dramatically changed the topology of the final tree, producing a 3D tree in the absence of fast‐evolving species 22 .…”
Section: Challenges To Carl Woese's Legacymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The marker selection process is a critical step in phylogenetic analysis since a single misleading protein can completely change the result obtained by the concatenation of dozens of proteins. This has been shown, for instance, in the case of elongation factor EF2 of two lineages (out of 18) of Asgard archaea that did not branch with other Asgard EF2 but as a sister group of eukaryotes, probably because of ancient LGT between these Asgard and proto‐eukaryotes 22,54 . Removal of this protein from the original data set of 36 markers dramatically changed the topology of the final tree, producing a 3D tree in the absence of fast‐evolving species 22 .…”
Section: Challenges To Carl Woese's Legacymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, the classical Woese's tree is most likely still the correct one (Figure 1E). The 2D trees obtained during the last decade can be explained by the presence of fast‐evolving species and small proteins in data sets, combined with the difficulty in recovering the short branch testifying to the monophyly of Archaea (for reviews and recent results, see Ref 54 …”
Section: Challenges To Carl Woese's Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field may directly affect chromate or grid protein, affect the function of grid cells, and then affect the secretion of norepinephrine. It is speculated that chromaffin cells may be an important magnetic response cell, and the magnetic field affects the basic metabolic level of organisms by interfering with the secretion of norepinephrine and epinephrine [18].…”
Section: Effect Of Sub Magnetic Field On Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans le scénario évolutif dit « deux domaines », selon lequel les eucaryotes seraient issus de l'association entre une archée, appelée Asgard, et une alpha-protéobactérie, il a été proposé que l'ensemble des eucaryovirus seraient les descendants des virus ayant infecté ces deux procaryotes [8] (Figure 2B). Dans l'autre scénario majeur, dit « trois domaines », selon lequel les eucaryotes et les archées partagent un ancêtre commun [9], certains groupes de virus spécifiques des eucaryotes auraient pu émerger avant cet ancêtre, voire avant LUCA 3 , et être ensuite perdus dans les autres domaines (Figure 2C, cercle orange). Ceci pourrait être en particulier le cas des familles de virus à ARN inconnus chez les bactéries, ce qui permet d'imaginer un lien de parenté direct entre les premiers virus à ARN apparus au cours de l'évolution et les virus à ARN des eucaryotes modernes.…”
Section: Origine Et Diversité Des Virus Eucaryotesunclassified
“…Les deux schémas du haut (A)représentent les relations évolutives entre les eucaryovirus, les bacteriovirus et les archéovirus des deux sphères de virus cosmopolites, les Varidnaviria[6,7] et les Duplodnaviria, montrant que les eucaryovirus se regroupent à part des deux autres ensembles de virus. Au contraire, les eucaryotes se regroupent avec les archées dans l'arbre universel du vivant fondé sur les ARN ribosomiques et/ ou les protéines universelles[9]. Les deux schémas du bas (B, C) représentent les deux scénarios pour l'origine des eucaryotes et de leurs virus.…”
unclassified