2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2237913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exodus from Sovereign Risk: Sovereign Ceiling Violations in Credit Default Swap Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almeida et al (2013) show that, following a sovereign downgrade, firms at the sovereign rating bound reduce investment and leverage more than other firms. Lee, Naranjo and Sirmans (2013) explore the role of country-level property rights institutions and disclosure requirements in explaining sovereign ceiling violations. Similarly, Bai and Wei (2012) and, in a later paper, Augustin et al (2014) find that strong country-level property rights institutions weaken the connection between sovereign and corporate credit risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almeida et al (2013) show that, following a sovereign downgrade, firms at the sovereign rating bound reduce investment and leverage more than other firms. Lee, Naranjo and Sirmans (2013) explore the role of country-level property rights institutions and disclosure requirements in explaining sovereign ceiling violations. Similarly, Bai and Wei (2012) and, in a later paper, Augustin et al (2014) find that strong country-level property rights institutions weaken the connection between sovereign and corporate credit risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai and Wei () study the sovereign–corporate risk transmission and argue that the correlation between sovereign and corporate spreads is stronger in countries that have weaker property rights as well as for state‐owned companies. Lee, Naranjo, and Sirmans () show that companies can decouple themselves from sovereign risk, either through foreign investments in countries with better property and creditor rights, or by cross‐listing in countries with more stringent disclosure requirements. In contemporaneous work, Bedendo and Colla () document a positive correlation between sovereign and corporate credit risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Lee et al (2013) provide preliminary evidence that average annual sovereign CDS spreads are negatively related to the degree of property and creditor rights and disclosure requirements (i.e. spreads are on average lower for countries with stronger property and creditor rights and more stringent disclosure requirements).…”
Section: Global and Local Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over the last decade, however, there has been an increasing number of sovereign ceiling violations, which means that companies have managed to decouple themselves and to borrow at better rates than their local government in the country of their domicile. The determinants of these sovereign ceiling violations are studied by Lee et al (2013), who show that companies are able to delink their risk profile from that of the local government if they hold foreign assets in jurisdictions with better property and creditor protection rights, and if they are crosslisted in countries with better disclosure requirements. The average difference-in-difference between corporate and sovereign CDS rates is reduced by 26 basis points through the combined exposure to these informational and institutional channels, with a stronger effect during the sovereign crisis.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Sovereign and Corporate Cdsmentioning
confidence: 99%