2010
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
452
0
75

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(531 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
452
0
75
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies by Tjader et al (in press), Hsu et al (2011) and Kaplan and Norton (2008) have helped clarify the structure of perspective interactions. According to the research, it is not possible to account completely and correctly for the perspective interaction without an overly complex model.…”
Section: Multiple-criteria Analysis and Performance Measurement: Methmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies by Tjader et al (in press), Hsu et al (2011) and Kaplan and Norton (2008) have helped clarify the structure of perspective interactions. According to the research, it is not possible to account completely and correctly for the perspective interaction without an overly complex model.…”
Section: Multiple-criteria Analysis and Performance Measurement: Methmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After publication of the mentioned article, Kaplan and Norton as well as other authors were gradually developing BSC into a more complex system, usable for describing, communicating, implementing and revising strategy. The fundamental texts on BSC are probably articles (Kaplan & Norton, 1992, 1993, 1996a, 2004b, 2008a, Kaplan (2005Kaplan ( , 2010 and books (Kaplan & Norton, 1996b, 2001, 2004a, 2008b to name those written by BSC creators. In these works (as well as in literature written by other authors) we can see development of balanced scorecard from a tool for multidimensional performance measurement (supplementing more traditional financial measures with non-financial measures, specifically with measures oriented toward customers, internal business processes and learning and growth activities) to the fully developed organizing framework for a strategic management system.…”
Section: Balanced Scorecardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial methodologies can be used to analyze tangible performance aspects of IS use, which corroborates the singular vision of technology use. However, it is necessary to identify indicators that can measure intangible aspects of firm performance, like quality, flexibility, and business innovation (Kaplan & Norton, 2008). IS use is measured by the benefits generated for the organization (A. L. Albertin & R. M. Albertin, 2012) to establish how technology influences the various perspectives of firm performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multiple indicators is necessary for the organization to obtain a consistent evaluation of firm performance and technology use (Mahmood, 1993). The balanced scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 2008) considers four perspectives understood to be appropriate and comprehensive to measure firm performance from the financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth perspectives..…”
Section: Theoretical Background Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%