BYTHE work of Venning and Browne (1937) on pregnanediol excretion during the menstrual cycle demonstrated that the presence of this steroid in urine was associated with the growth of the corpus luteum. The methods first evolved for the assay of urinary pregnanediol were lacking in sensitivity. They were not entirely specific for pregnanediol and at low levels of pregnanediol excretion their accuracy and precision were poor. The original studies showed that pregnanediol was a metabolite of progesterone. It came to be widely assumed that the corpus luteum and the placenta were the only two structures in the body capable of giving rise to progesterone and hence to urinary pregnanediol. This opinion had to be modified when Engel, Thorn and Lewis (1941) isolated from 1, OOO litres of mule urine 63 mg. of 5Ppregnane-3a : 20a-diol,-the particular substance to which the common name pregnanediol is applied. It is now generally believed that the adrenal glands in both sexes produce a precursor (possibly progesterone), which gives rise to a proportion of the urinary pregnanediol. This view is supported by the recent investigations of Klopper, Strong and Cook (1957) who showed that, when ovarian pregnanediol could be excluded, the urinary levels of pregnanediol reflected the activity of the adrenal glands. The excretion of pregnanediol was considerably increased by operative stress or the administration of corticotrophin. The effect of such stimuli was abolished by adrenalectomy, after which operation measurable amounts of pregnanediol could no longer be found in urine.The elaboration of a new technique for the assay of urinary pregnanediol (Klopper, Michie and Brown, 1955) has made it possible to measure the small amount of pregnanediol which arises from the adrenal. The purpose of this communication is to report a study of the daily excretion of pregnanediol during the menstrual cycle using this assay technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this investigation the urinary pregnanediol output of 17 ambulant women was determined daily throughout at least one cycle. Assays were started a few days before the expected onset of the period and continued until the end of the next menstruation. The 24 hours in which bleeding began was designated Day 1. Oral temperatures were recorded on awakening. All but two of the subjects were healthy women engaged in their normal routine. The remaining two were hospital patients under observation for carcinoma of the breast. As far as could be ascertained by questioning, all the women were having regular, normal cycles. They were, for the most part, either the wives of colleagues or workers in the laboratory, and it is very likely that 24-hour collections were correctly carried out.The urines were collected without preservative and stored in the refrigerator. Pregnanediol determinations were done in duplicate, 1120th of a 24-hour specimen being used for each determination. The values recorded are the average of each pair of duplicates. The assay method used has been critically examined recently in ot...