2001
DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v21i2.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exclusion of Persons with Physical Disabilities from Prime Time Television Advertising: A Two Year Quantitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advertising images that utilised people who had impairments were ‘few and far between in mainstream media publications’ (Thomas, 2001). Indeed, although the United States was faster than the United Kingdom to reflect disability in commercial advertising (Haller & Ralph, 2001; Scott-Parker, 1989), a 2-year quantitative analysis conducted in 1998–1999 found that people who had visible impairments were portrayed ‘far less frequently in the commercials than their 6.5% of the population as reported by the Census Bureau (1994)’ (Ganahl & Arbuckle, 2001). In relation to Britain, advertisements on American television were more prevalent and less restricted (Haller & Ralph, 2001), but nonetheless harshly underrepresented people who had impairments.…”
Section: A Recent Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advertising images that utilised people who had impairments were ‘few and far between in mainstream media publications’ (Thomas, 2001). Indeed, although the United States was faster than the United Kingdom to reflect disability in commercial advertising (Haller & Ralph, 2001; Scott-Parker, 1989), a 2-year quantitative analysis conducted in 1998–1999 found that people who had visible impairments were portrayed ‘far less frequently in the commercials than their 6.5% of the population as reported by the Census Bureau (1994)’ (Ganahl & Arbuckle, 2001). In relation to Britain, advertisements on American television were more prevalent and less restricted (Haller & Ralph, 2001), but nonetheless harshly underrepresented people who had impairments.…”
Section: A Recent Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And [their] standard is blonde and blue eyed.” 3 This narrow scope may account for why few disabled people have been featured in product advertisements and why they are practically nonexistent in television ads (Ganahl and Kallem, 1998). In an industry defined by an “image is everything” modus operandi, to borrow from (Ganahl and Arbuckle, 2001: 6), images must exude “power, credibility and appeal”—qualities dissociated from disability. Givhan’s statement also suggests that what drives innovation is a conscious effort among leaders—some form of cultural entrepreneurship that calls into question the risk-reward ratio typically excluding disability from fashion images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, people with a visible disability are almost entirely absent from US prime-time television [7]. Indeed, very few TV characters are disabled [8], while films very seldom feature children or youth with impairments; characters with learning disabilities are particularly rarely included [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%