2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1064775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Excluded Minors for Isometric Realizability in the Plane

Abstract: Let G be a graph and p ∈ [1, ∞]. The parameter f p (G) is the least integer k such that for all m and all vectors (r

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If Lemma 3.5(1) holds then we have a contradiction since adding back v and its 3 neighbours would violate (2, 2, 0)-gain-sparsity. So Lemma 3.5 (2) holds and H bc ∪ H bd is balanced with f (H bc ∪ H bd ) = 2. However by gain switching we can make all edges incident to v have gain 1 and hence H bc ∪ h bd ∪ v is balanced, again contradicting (2, 2, 0)-gain-sparsity.…”
Section: The Gain Of a Path Of Directed Edgesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If Lemma 3.5(1) holds then we have a contradiction since adding back v and its 3 neighbours would violate (2, 2, 0)-gain-sparsity. So Lemma 3.5 (2) holds and H bc ∪ H bd is balanced with f (H bc ∪ H bd ) = 2. However by gain switching we can make all edges incident to v have gain 1 and hence H bc ∪ h bd ∪ v is balanced, again contradicting (2, 2, 0)-gain-sparsity.…”
Section: The Gain Of a Path Of Directed Edgesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(See [18,19,20] e.g.). This transfer of knowledge between fundamental and applied researchers is one of the motivations for exploring constraint systems in new geometric contexts, such as the normed spaces considered in this article (see also [1,2] for related problems). Another strong motivation comes from the potential for developing combinatorial Laman-type characterisations ( [8]) of rigid graphs in any dimension, due to the amenability of the matroidal sparsity counts arising in some of these contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 24 ( [12]). Let G be a 2-connected graph with distinct vertices u and v such that deg G (w) ≥ 3 for all w ∈ V (G) \{u, v}.…”
Section: -Connected Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for all p ∈ [1, ∞], K 3 is the only excluded minor for f p (G) ≤ 1. Fiorini, Huynh, Joret, and Varvitsiotis [12] determined that W 4 , the wheel on 5 vertices, and the graph K 4 + e K 4 (see Figure 1) are the only excluded minors for f ∞ (G) ≤ 2 and for f 1 (G) ≤ 2. As far as we know, the complete set of excluded minors for f p (G) ≤ k is unknown for all other values of p and k.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the rigidity of frameworks in normed spaces can be seen to date back to Kitson and Power [23], while research into flexible motions of frameworks in normed spaces was considered earlier by Cook, Lovett and Morgan [12]. The closely related topic of graph flattenability -determining whether all placements of a graph in an infinite-dimensional ℓ p space can be embedded into a d-dimensional ℓ p space whilst preserving edge lengths -dates back even further to the work of Holsztynski [20], Witsenhausen [30], and Ball [4], and has been further continued in recent years by Willoughby and Sitharam [29] and Fiorini, Huynh, Joret, and Varvitsiotis [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%