The 0–0 energies of 80 medium
and large molecules have been
computed with a large panel of theoretical formalisms. We have used
an approach computationally tractable for large molecules, that is,
the structural and vibrational parameters are obtained with TD-DFT,
the solvent effects are accounted for with the PCM model, whereas
the total and transition energies have been determined with TD-DFT
and with five wave function approaches accounting for contributions
from double excitations, namely, CIS(D), ADC(2), CC2, SCS-CC2, and
SOS-CC2, as well as Green’s function based BSE/GW approach. Atomic basis sets including diffuse functions have been
systematically applied, and several variations of the PCM have been
evaluated. Using solvent corrections obtained with corrected linear-response
approach, we found that three schemes, namely, ADC(2), CC2, and BSE/GW allow one to reach a mean absolute deviation smaller
than 0.15 eV compared to the measurements, the two former yielding
slightly better correlation with experiments than the latter. CIS(D),
SCS-CC2, and SOS-CC2 provide significantly larger deviations, though
the latter approach delivers highly consistent transition energies.
In addition, we show that (i) ADC(2) and CC2 values are extremely
close to each other but for systems absorbing at low energies; (ii)
the linear-response PCM scheme tends to overestimate solvation effects;
and that (iii) the average impact of nonequilibrium correction on
0–0 energies is negligible.