2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exchange Network: An Architecture for the Negotiation of Non-Repudiable Token Exchanges

Abstract: Many use cases coming out of initiatives such as Industry 4.0 and Ubiquitous Computing require that systems be able to cooperate by negotiating about and agreeing on the exchange of arbitrary values. While solutions able to facilitate such negotiation exist, they tend to either be domain-specific or lack mechanisms for non-repudiation, which make them unfit for the heterogeneity and scale of many compelling applications. In this paper, we present the Exchange Network, a generalpurpose and implementation-indepe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is that we believe it could be motivated to implement this architecture in different ways to facilitate different kinds of use cases, even though hashes and signatures are used by the realization we outline in Section IV. If interested to read more about such strategies, please refer to [19], in which we describe the implications of implementing a predecessor of this architecture in three different ways. Those approaches are (1) relying on a trusted centrally managed application, (2) implementing it on top of a blockchain network, as well as (3) using an approach reminiscent of the one presented in this paper.…”
Section: Implementation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that we believe it could be motivated to implement this architecture in different ways to facilitate different kinds of use cases, even though hashes and signatures are used by the realization we outline in Section IV. If interested to read more about such strategies, please refer to [19], in which we describe the implications of implementing a predecessor of this architecture in three different ways. Those approaches are (1) relying on a trusted centrally managed application, (2) implementing it on top of a blockchain network, as well as (3) using an approach reminiscent of the one presented in this paper.…”
Section: Implementation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have worked together with other project participants, representing Volvo Group, SEB, NXP and other companies, 3 to better understand the real-world circumstances in which these cross-organizational systems would have to exist. One of the fruits of this collaboration is the EN architecture, which we presented previously in [12]. That first paper focuses on the architecture itself, the implications of implementing it with different consensus models, and how it could be used by Volvo Trucks.…”
Section: Background and Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we only describe one way of implementing the architecture in this paper, which is intended to demonstrate a non-disruptive approach to designing systems for digital collaboration. In [12], we also consider how a blockchain system like Hyperledger Fabric [4], or a common database system like MySQL [19], could be used as implementation foundations.…”
Section: A Architecture Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the idea is not imposable to be included for consumers to list their desired items on the BeIMP. Therefore, our proposed platform can also let the prosumer (such as designers or manufacturers) to search their target customer, then negotiate [53] and bidding [54], and finally form the order sent to the blockchain.…”
Section: ) System Comparison and Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%