1950
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.36.2.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exceptional Simple Lie Algebras F 4 and E 6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
5

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
59
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending in a similar manner, we find that C⊕V has the structure of an Albert algebra (a type of Jordan algebra) and F 4 is the automorphism group of that algebra; see [32], [148, §7.2], or [107, 26.18].…”
Section: E 8 As An Automorphism Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending in a similar manner, we find that C⊕V has the structure of an Albert algebra (a type of Jordan algebra) and F 4 is the automorphism group of that algebra; see [32], [148, §7.2], or [107, 26.18].…”
Section: E 8 As An Automorphism Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QQ [7,1] = e [7]; QQ [7,2] = e [6]; QQ [7,3] = −e [8]; QQ [7,4] = e [5]; QQ [7,5] = −e [4]; QQ [7,6] = −e [2]; QQ [7,7] = −e [1]; QQ [7,8] %%%% construction of the matrices MT = { {{mt [1], 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {mt [2], mt [3], mt [4], mt [5], mt [6], mt [7], mt [8], mt [9]}, {mt [10], mt [11] C The matrices.…”
Section: The Volume Of Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our starting point for the construction of the exceptional algebra e 6 is a Theorem due to Chevalley and Schafer [5] which we rewrite here for convenience We will refer to [8] for the notations. Then the exceptional Jordan algebra is the algebra J 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e $}-the algebra of norm skew transformations in $-is the split Lie algebra £^( [7]). ®(3f) = {derivations of ^} -{D e 8(3) | ID -0} = {£> e £(£) | -JD* -D], # denoting transpose with respect to the trace form, is the split Lie algebra F* ( [7]). QQIΣke,) ^{De 3)(3) or 8(3) 1^ = 0^ = 1, 2, 3} is the split Lie algebra D 4 ([7]).…”
Section: ) 3) = ©((£) and 2 = §((£ Ri) Then Every Isomorphism A :mentioning
confidence: 99%