2008
DOI: 10.1179/019713608806112151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Excavation, Conservation, Storage, and Display of Rubber Artifacts Recovered From the USSMonitor(1862)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider that underwater storage needs detailed examination enabling analysis of its pros and cons, Since no trials have been performed to proof the efectiveness of this approach, and although in principle exposes various risk, in rare instances rubber objects have been found submerged under water in surprisingly good condition (Grieve 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that underwater storage needs detailed examination enabling analysis of its pros and cons, Since no trials have been performed to proof the efectiveness of this approach, and although in principle exposes various risk, in rare instances rubber objects have been found submerged under water in surprisingly good condition (Grieve 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that underwater storage needs detailed examination enabling analysis of its pros and cons, Since no trials have been performed to proof the effectiveness of this approach, and although in principle exposes various risk, in rare instances rubber objects have been found submerged under water in surprisingly good condition (Grieve 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%