The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism

Nordholt, J.W. Schulte

doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8931-3_5

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, sometimes registers with information about the whole population can be linked on a unit level to sample data sets. This is for example the case at Statistics Netherlands where complete population registers were used in the 2011 Dutch census (Schulte Nordholt et al 2014). If this is the case, the nonsampled units can be imputed as well (besides the item and unit nonresponse within the sample).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Obtain Valid Inference under Unit Nonresponse?

Boeschoten

Vink

Hox

2017

Journal of Official Statistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Weighting methods are commonly used in situations of unit nonresponse with linked register data. However, several arguments in terms of valid inference and practical usability can be made against the use of weighting methods in these situations. Imputation methods such as sample and mass imputation may be suitable alternatives, as they lead to valid inference in situations of item nonresponse and have some practical advantages. In a simulation study, sample and mass imputation were compared to traditional weighting when dealing with unit nonresponse in linked register data. Methods were compared on their bias and coverage in different scenarios. Both, sample and mass imputation, had better coverage than traditional weighting in all scenarios.Imputation methods can therefore be recommended over weighting as they also have practical advantages, such as that estimates outside the observed data distribution can be created and that many auxiliary variables can be taken into account. The use of sample or mass imputation depends on the specific data structure.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%