1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.454705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The exact multicenter multipolar part of a molecular charge distribution and its simplified representations

Abstract: We study the problem of representing the molecular charge distribution in a convenient way for practical applications and we propose, instead of a single representation, a flexible procedure for building approximations with an arbitrary level of accuracy as concerns the long-range part of the electrostatic potential. We first discuss the splitting of the total electrostatic potential into a multipolar part (long-range) and a penetration part (shortrange) in connection with the usual one-center multipole expans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
170
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of multicentered multipolar expansions, instead of classical force field or potential derived atom charges, is a more theoretical grounded and precise way to compute molecular electrostatic properties 61,62 with a reasonable computational cost even in biological macromolecules. 30,[63][64][65] Moreover, previous studies indicate that in protein electrostatic investigations the OME reassociation method is the best choice in order to achieve a better and more homogeneous description of both the electrostatic potential and the intensity and direction of the electric field.…”
Section: Electrostatic Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multicentered multipolar expansions, instead of classical force field or potential derived atom charges, is a more theoretical grounded and precise way to compute molecular electrostatic properties 61,62 with a reasonable computational cost even in biological macromolecules. 30,[63][64][65] Moreover, previous studies indicate that in protein electrostatic investigations the OME reassociation method is the best choice in order to achieve a better and more homogeneous description of both the electrostatic potential and the intensity and direction of the electric field.…”
Section: Electrostatic Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a procedure was originally demonstrated to provide a very good approximation of the true multipolar energy. 4 The values of the multipolar Coulomb energy were computed using the SIBFA package.…”
Section: Charge Transfer Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 For example, the value of the true intermolecular Coulomb energy (the intermolecular electrostatic contribution) cannot be matched in the bonding area by traditional classical approaches using long range approximations such as fitted point charges 2 or even with more advanced distributed multipole representations. [3][4][5][6] Indeed, short range quantum effects related to the overlap of electron clouds (penetration energy) are missing from current force fields and are a non-negligible source of error. In other words, if the goal is to reach "chemical accuracy" it is not enough for a model energy function to perform well outside the molecular van der Waals envelope; it is also important to be able to reproduce energies even when electronic densities overlap (especially in molecular dynamics simulations where close contacts are frequently generated).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The original molecular-centered expansion has been largely superseded by a distributed multipole expansion in terms of specific atomic or site contributions, due to its better convergence properties. 14,16,17 In order to employ this expression, the atomic or site-specific multipolar moments need to be determined by partitioning the wave function or the electronic density. A disadvantage of the multipolar expansion is that this approximation neglects the charge penetration effects which may be substantial at short range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%