Public reporting burden for tsis collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of infotnnadon, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Sukie 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)2
SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR / MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)Office of Naval Research One Liberty Center 875 North Randolph Street 11. SPONSOR / MONITOR'S REPORT Arlington, VA 22217-1995 NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES *Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MD **Nova Research, Inc., Alexandria, VA
ABSTRACTThe Volume Sensor Prototype (VSP) system has been designed to detect, flame, smoldering fires, water releases (e.g., pipe ruptures), gas leaks, and hot objects and to discriminate nuisance sources, such as hot work. The tests presented in this report were conducted on the ex-USS Shadwvell from July 25 to August 5, 2005, to evaluate the VSP systems operating in six test compartments. The VSP performance was compared to the performance of state-of-the-art spot-type smoke detection systems. The VSP systems demonstrated the ability to function in multiple compartments, specifically discriminating between multiple types of events in multiple compartments. The VSP systems demonstrated the ability to discriminate between source types by detecting flaming and smoldering fire sources, water releases, and gas releases while rejecting nuisance sources. The VSP systems generally performed better than Video Image Detectors and spot-type smoke detection systems relative to range of detection capabilities, ability to detect fires, ability to reject nuisance sources, and speed of response.