The Evolving Taxonomy of Progressive Creation

Abstract

This essay is a critique of a version of progressive creation developed by Michael Chaberek, O. P. He holds that there are exceptions to evolutionary descent due to the supernatural production of “natural species,” taxa that allegedly do not have biological ancestry, are theologically identified with biblical kinds, and are metaphysically characterized by distinct substantial forms. Chaberek’s assertion that these natural species correspond “roughly” to the Linnaean taxa of biological families contradicts modern scientific conclusions regarding the continuity of evolutionary descent. To illustrate this conflict, I examine some of the extensive evidence for the evolutionary origins of families within the Feliformia sub-order. I conclude that Chaberek’s assertion of supernatural progressive creation is a God-of-the-gaps theology burdened by a defensive stance with respect to scientific progress.

Urban Piety & Camino de Santiago: Impact of Medieval Cities on Pilgrimage Devotion

“…In churches along the Way of St. James, as demonstrated by the example of Toruń, this thematic thread persisted, albeit adapted to architectural constraints. This underscored a characteristic aspect of urban piety, which emphasized the significance of every virtuous act, sacrifice, and renunciation, ultimately drawing one closer to the attainment of heavenly glory 44 .…”

Thomistic Hylomorphism and Theistic Evolution

“…A more careful delineation of these terms would facilitate a direct comparison to Michael Chaberek's unproductive conflation of all the above-mentioned concepts into a single notion of "natural species." See Chaberek 2021b, Hofmann 2020, and Hofmann 2023.…”