2010
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolving field of medical education research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been significant recent advances in the emerging discipline of Indigenous health in medical education 20–23 and in frameworks for designing Indigenous health curricula. 24–26 Despite these developments and the acknowledged challenges in determining causal associations, 27 there is limited evidence that medical education initiatives have effectively translated into improved health outcomes for Indigenous populations or a reduction in disparities. 28,29…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been significant recent advances in the emerging discipline of Indigenous health in medical education 20–23 and in frameworks for designing Indigenous health curricula. 24–26 Despite these developments and the acknowledged challenges in determining causal associations, 27 there is limited evidence that medical education initiatives have effectively translated into improved health outcomes for Indigenous populations or a reduction in disparities. 28,29…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest value of grant funding is perhaps the dedicated time it allows the researcher. 22,23 Until VER is funded by universities and external grants, protected time is unlikely to be set aside to complete it. As with any research field, dedicated funded time is where the most progress is made, when academics can work on complex issues and how to link these to patient benefits.…”
Section: Lack Of Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been a number of histories of medical education published (Hodges 2005;Bradley 2006;Calman 2006), they have tended to be high-level and systems-based rather than researcher-or topic-based (Bradley 2006;Traynor & Eva 2010), and as a result, we have little in the academic record about how programs and networks of research have developed over time. This is not to say that there is no history in what we publish; in fact, I would argue that academic papers regularly offer at least two forms of historical account.…”
Section: History and Evidence In Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%