The Evolving Environment for Intellectual Property Tax Management in China

García, Alan; Jiang, Josephine; Turley, Conrad; Wang, Mimi

doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1119-1_8

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One example is the High New Technology Enterprise (HNTE) Program, which lists patents in force as an eligibility criterion(Garcia et al 2016). Because the program offers a tax reduction for accredited firms, the expected value of patenting increases for HNTE applicants.10 In 2013, 87% of PCT applications came from high-income countries, 12% from upper-middle-income countries (thereof 10% from China) and only 1% from lower-middle-income countries (WIPO 2015b).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring China's patent quality: Development and validation of ISR indices

Boeing

Mueller

2019

China Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because China has become one of the largest applicants of PCT patents, it is of interest to compare the quality of Chinese and non-Chinese applications. We extend a quality index based on internationally comparable citation data from international search reports (ISR) to consider foreign, domestic, and self citations. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT patent applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests a higher quality level that converges to or even surpasses the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that in China, only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. Using Germany as a representative country without policy support for patenting, we show that all three citations types may be used as economic indicators if policy distortion is not a concern. Our results show that domestic and self citations suffer from an upward bias in China and should be employed with caution if they are to be interpreted as a measure of patent quality.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%