2013
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolving Classroom: A Study of Traditional and Technology-Based Instruction in a STEM Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, as Carlson [51] suggests, millennials consume and learn from a wide variety of media, often simultaneously. Similarly, other authors believe that there is substantial evidence that incorporating technology of any kind in the traditional classroom as an instructional tool enhances student learning and educational outcomes [52]. This mixed-methods model is advantageous to action teachers because it "can result in well-validated and substantiated findings" [53] (pp.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as Carlson [51] suggests, millennials consume and learn from a wide variety of media, often simultaneously. Similarly, other authors believe that there is substantial evidence that incorporating technology of any kind in the traditional classroom as an instructional tool enhances student learning and educational outcomes [52]. This mixed-methods model is advantageous to action teachers because it "can result in well-validated and substantiated findings" [53] (pp.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of students with disabilities in STEM education is accomplished through activities and lessons which highlight students’ abilities and learning processes (Basham & Marino, 2013). Student-friendly computer programming software, such as Cherp or Blockly (Sullivan & Heffernan, 2016), allows young students to problem solve, create code, and learn basic STEM skills through an accessible medium (Devlin, Feldhaus, & Bentrem, 2013; Lottero-Perdue, Lovelidge, & Bowling, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have recently and increasingly included the quantifiable benefits of using learning technology in post‐secondary settings, such as increased levels of student “soft” and “hard” measures of student learning. Soft or indirect measures of student learning include reported satisfaction 4 and self‐reported levels of student engagement, 5 7 motivation, 8 and interest 9 . Even though self‐reported student engagement may provide some sense of the impact of teaching, it in no way captures the three types of student engagement: affective, behavioral, and cognitive 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%