2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolutionary similarity of the co-shareholder relationship network from institutional and non-institutional shareholder perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we construct undirected weighted information flow networks embodied by shareholders. The process of network construction follows previous research [ 17 , 36 , 37 ] using the decreasing-mode method, which is based on complex network theory. Listed energy companies and shareholders comprise two different sets of actors, and because two given listed energy companies are held by the same shareholder simultaneously, we treat the shareholder as common shareholder; the two companies have co-shareholder relationship, which form an equivalence network [ 18 , 38 ] among listed energy companies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we construct undirected weighted information flow networks embodied by shareholders. The process of network construction follows previous research [ 17 , 36 , 37 ] using the decreasing-mode method, which is based on complex network theory. Listed energy companies and shareholders comprise two different sets of actors, and because two given listed energy companies are held by the same shareholder simultaneously, we treat the shareholder as common shareholder; the two companies have co-shareholder relationship, which form an equivalence network [ 18 , 38 ] among listed energy companies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%