2014
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolutionary ecology of C4plants

Abstract: 765I.765II.767III.768IV.768V.770VI.771VII.773VIII.777777References777 Summary C4 photosynthesis is a physiological syndrome resulting from multiple anatomical and biochemical components, which function together to increase the CO2 concentration around Rubisco and reduce photorespiration. It evolved independently multiple times and C4 plants now dominate many biomes, especially in the tropics and subtropics. The C4 syndrome comes in many flavours, with numerous phenotypic realizations of C4 physiology and div… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
(354 reference statements)
3
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…C 4 photosynthesis, although generally an adaptation to open and warm habitats, covers a large ecological spectrum (Christin & Osborne, ), and C 4 grassland communities in South Africa have been shown to cluster phylogenetically depending on humidity, fire regime and grazer disturbance (Visser, Woodward, Freckleton, & Osborne, ). In Madagascar, Andropogoneae and Chloridoideae also tend to dominate in more mesic versus more dry habitats, respectively (Bond et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C 4 photosynthesis, although generally an adaptation to open and warm habitats, covers a large ecological spectrum (Christin & Osborne, ), and C 4 grassland communities in South Africa have been shown to cluster phylogenetically depending on humidity, fire regime and grazer disturbance (Visser, Woodward, Freckleton, & Osborne, ). In Madagascar, Andropogoneae and Chloridoideae also tend to dominate in more mesic versus more dry habitats, respectively (Bond et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C 3 plants, where the photorespiratory pathway has evolved to carry large fluxes, its suppression could also destabilize plant cell metabolism due to perturbations in flux control properties of photosynthates production and consequences for N and S assimilation (Cornish‐Bowden, , Abadie, Boex‐Fontvieille, Carroll, & Tcherkez, , Eisenhut et al, , Busch, Sage, & Farquhar, , see also below). In other words, the cost/benefit ratio for photorespiration is probably not as large as often assumed and depends on a complex combination of environmental drivers (temperature, CO 2 concentration, and precipitation), as recent insights in the ecology of C 4 plants suggest (Christin & Osborne, ; Urban, Nelson, Street‐Perrott, Verschuren, & Hu, ). Benefits for crops from an oxygenase‐free Rubisco are thus difficult to anticipate considering potential consequences for the metabolic network associated with the oxygenase activity and photorespiratory recovery.…”
Section: How Slow Is Rubisco?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Photorespiration, which reduces the efficiency of photosynthesis, is more likely to occur in C 3 plants during periods of high temperatures and low atmospheric CO 2 (Sage 2004; Edwards et al 2010). In contrast, C 4 plants increase their carbon-fixation efficiency by saturating the Rubisco enzyme with CO 2 (Ehleringer 1978; Edwards et al 2010; Christin and Osborne 2014). Thus lower CO 2 is competitively advantageous to C 4 plants (Ehleringer et al 1997; Edwards et al 2010) and in eras of high atmospheric CO 2 , C 4 plant have less of a competitive advantage over C 3 plants offering a plausible reason for woody encroachment (Idso 1992).…”
Section: Global Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%