2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1686009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Zoning Since the 1980s: The Persistence of Localism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against libertarians' arguments that any restriction on property rights is a taking, and that the best way to public interest is unrestricted pursuit of individual interest, planners represent public interest outside the aggregate of individual goods (Mukhija, 2005), highlighting instead the need to balance on the one hand, "public interest", and, on the other, individual property owners' rights. This is why many land-use planners have come to describe zoning as "public rights in private land" (Fischel, 2012).…”
Section: Public Good Versus Private Interest In Land Use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against libertarians' arguments that any restriction on property rights is a taking, and that the best way to public interest is unrestricted pursuit of individual interest, planners represent public interest outside the aggregate of individual goods (Mukhija, 2005), highlighting instead the need to balance on the one hand, "public interest", and, on the other, individual property owners' rights. This is why many land-use planners have come to describe zoning as "public rights in private land" (Fischel, 2012).…”
Section: Public Good Versus Private Interest In Land Use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of regulatory method varies which includes such things as purchase development right, purchase in fee, gifting to a trust, use-value taxation, growth-management acts, agricultural protection zoning, and many others. Among these long list methods, the agricultural protection zoning is the most persistent method despite many criticisms of its shortcomings [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, questions about property surface indirectly in discussions about conflicting public and private interests where key assumptions about the ownership model remain unchallenged. Hence, numerous academic papers describe land-use planners wrestling to balance what are identified as two separate, pre-existing categories of "private" and "public" interests (Alterman, 2011;Alexander, 2007;Azuella & Herrera, 2009;Campbell & Marshall, 2002;Davy, 2012;Fischel, 2012;Grout, Plantinga, & Jaeger, 2014;Healey, 1997). 1 These public/private tensions are furthermore operationalized in planning handbooks, textbooks, and academic papers where they frequently appear in the form of questions such as: "Is there a need to compensate private owners because of restrictive planning regulations?"…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"what level of coercion is acceptable before a regulatory taking can be equated to a full taking?" (Davy, 2012;Fischel, 2012;Ingram & Hong, 2009;Platt, 2014;Renard, 2009), and "How do we estimate the acceptable amount of compensations and their effectiveness?" (Grout et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%