2009
DOI: 10.5252/az2009n1a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of sheep and goat husbandry in central Anatolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Göbekli Tepe and Çatalhöyük) [112–114]. Wild animal hunting likely held particular symbolic importance, which became especially poignant as the division of labor and labor scheduling were reconfigured during the development of animal management and cultivation [108,110,115,116]. Wild animal hunting may have sent a more costly signal of group membership than that of controlled animals during many types of rituals at KHH, such as feasts featuring the communal hunting of multiple dangerous wild cattle individuals [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Göbekli Tepe and Çatalhöyük) [112–114]. Wild animal hunting likely held particular symbolic importance, which became especially poignant as the division of labor and labor scheduling were reconfigured during the development of animal management and cultivation [108,110,115,116]. Wild animal hunting may have sent a more costly signal of group membership than that of controlled animals during many types of rituals at KHH, such as feasts featuring the communal hunting of multiple dangerous wild cattle individuals [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the use of less nutritious foods remains low but fairly constant, suggesting that suitable resource provision remained possible. Support for this is found in evidence of healthy herds with limited confinement-related pathologies (Russell and Martin, 2005), and by robust herd security allowing some slaughter to be delayed beyond the most economic kill-off age (Arbuckle et al, 2009).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 86%
“…ZooMS was applied to the collagen in order to test the fidelity of morphological specific identifications and to differentiate the caprines. The rationale for doing so is (a) that some of the selected specimens were very fragmentary and therefore had heightened chances of having been misidentified, (b) that sheep and goats are often raised for very different purposes and may feed on different foodstuffs (Arbuckle, Öztan, & Gülçur, ), (c) to determine the composition of the caprine component of the Racot 18 faunal assemblage, and (d) to evaluate the validity and utility of morphometric and metric methods of caprine differentiation.…”
Section: Zoomsmentioning
confidence: 99%