1996
DOI: 10.1086/192346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Rotation and Activity in Young Open Clusters: IC 2391

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
254
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
254
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of the X-ray luminosity relative to the bolometric luminosity on the Rossby number was confirmed for F5 through M5 main-sequence stars using both clusters and field stars (e.g. Patten & Simon 1996;Randich et al 2000).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dependence of the X-ray luminosity relative to the bolometric luminosity on the Rossby number was confirmed for F5 through M5 main-sequence stars using both clusters and field stars (e.g. Patten & Simon 1996;Randich et al 2000).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The X-ray emission from late-type stars in open clusters exhibits two kinds of dependences on stellar rotation (e.g. Patten & Simon 1996;Randich 2000;Feigelson et al 2003;Pizzolato et al 2003). Fast rotators show a relatively constant X-ray to bolometric luminosity ratio at the so-called (L X /L bol ) ≈ 10 −3 saturation level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both chromospheric activity indicators and X-ray studies, furthermore, can be used as proxies for measurements of the strength of stellar magnetic fields. There is now extensive empirical evidence that both chromospheric and coronal indicators become independent of the rotation rate above a mass-dependent critical angular velocity (e.g., Patten & Simon 1996); this would imply a much lower angular momentum loss rate for rapid rotators. We note that this does not contradict the overall Weber & Davis (1967) model in the case of slow rotators; however, all of the direct and indirect observational tests in low-mass stars and open clusters of different ages indicates that it overestimates the angular momentum loss rate for rotation periods shorter than 2.5-5 days.…”
Section: Angular Momentum Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide spread of rotational velocities among any given population of very young early-G (solar-type) stars [Stauffer and Soderblom, 1991;Patten and Simon, 1996]. However, the angular momentum loss mechanism appears to operate in such a way that the broad distribution of spins at age 50-70 Myr (as in the young galactic clusters a Persei and the Pleiades) is funneled into a much narrower distribution at age •600 Myr (as in the nearby Hyades cluster) [Stauffer and Hartmann, 1987 It is convenient to separate calculation of the time history of solar-induced photoionization into four moreor-less independent parts.…”
Section: Rotational Convergence Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%