2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of red supergiant mass-loss rates

Abstract: The fate of massive stars with initial masses >8M ⊙ depends largely on the mass-loss rate ( M) in the end stages of their lives. Red supergiants (RSGs) are the direct progenitors to Type II-P core collapse supernovae (SN), but there is uncertainty regarding the scale and impact of any mass-loss during this phase. Here we used near and mid-IR photometry and the radiative transfer code DUSTY to determine luminosity and M values for the RSGs in two Galactic clusters (NGC 7419 and χ Per) where the RSGs are all of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that RSGs may experience strong mass loss that would lead to significant circumstellar extinction, as seen in some of the most luminous RSGs (e.g. Massey et al 2005;Davies et al 2008;Beasor & Davies 2018). Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We note that RSGs may experience strong mass loss that would lead to significant circumstellar extinction, as seen in some of the most luminous RSGs (e.g. Massey et al 2005;Davies et al 2008;Beasor & Davies 2018). Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Jura & Kleinmann 1990). In addition, the total mass of the CSM inferred from our analysis of the pseudo-bolometric light curve ( 3.5 M ; see Section 3.1.2) is more than a factor of 3 higher than that expected to be lost by a lower mass star during the RSG phase (< 1 M for a star with an initial mass of 16 M ; Beasor & Davies 2018). As a consequence, there are a number of consistent, although not compelling, indications suggesting that the progenitor of SN 2015da was a LBV star.…”
Section: The Progenitor Starmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Young et al (2006) infer a progenitor with an initial mass of 15 -25 M that has lost most but not all of its hydrogen envelope. The similarity with SN 1993J, and the fact that progenitors in this mass range are generally considered not to have winds strong enough to lose their envelope (Heger et al 2003;Beasor & Davies 2018), has lead many to consider a binary scenario for the progenitor of Cas A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%