2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks in the Arches Cluster

Abstract: Most stars form in a cluster environment. These stars are initially surrounded by discs from which potentially planetary systems form. Of all cluster environments starburst clusters are probably the most hostile for planetary systems in our Galaxy. The intense stellar radiation and extreme density favour rapid destruction of circumstellar discs via photoevaporation and stellar encounters. Evolving a virialized model of the Arches cluster in the Galactic tidal field we investigate the effect of stellar encounte… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall disk fraction for the B stars in the Arches cluster is 6%, much lower than what would expect from the disk fraction age relation (Haisch et al 2001). They explain the decrease in disk fraction toward the center by either UV radiation destruction, winds, or the tidal destruction mechanism of Olczak et al (2012) that has the important characteristic, in the context of this work, of destroying the disk without destroying the dust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The overall disk fraction for the B stars in the Arches cluster is 6%, much lower than what would expect from the disk fraction age relation (Haisch et al 2001). They explain the decrease in disk fraction toward the center by either UV radiation destruction, winds, or the tidal destruction mechanism of Olczak et al (2012) that has the important characteristic, in the context of this work, of destroying the disk without destroying the dust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For the denser cluster models (especially E52), a detailed study of the influence of hyperbolic fly-bys on disksizes would be favorable. Previous studies suggest that their influence on the disks (in these cases, the diskmass and angular momentum) is much smaller than the one of parabolic encounters (for detailed discussions, see, e.g., Pfalzner et al 2005c;Olczak et al 2010Olczak et al , 2012. Therefore, the disksizes presented here might be lower limits.…”
Section: Appendix Fly-by Velocity and Eccentricitymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This change was already noticed in the context of the influence of encounters on protoplanetary discs (Olczak et al 2010;Duke & Krumholz 2012;Olczak et al 2012;Pfalzner 2013). It was found there that parabolic encounters with low-mass stars (<0.5 M ) and the few most massive stars of the system dominate at mean cluster densities of ≈10 3 pc −3 .…”
Section: Nature Of the Encounter-induced Mass Lossmentioning
confidence: 69%