2018
DOI: 10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of open learning: A review of the transition from pre-e-learning to the era of e-learning

Abstract: This paper offers a summary of the developments that open learning has gone through, from the stages before e-learning emerged to when it carved out a niche position. It first analyzes how open learning moved through five stages, and identifies the characteristics and dominant technology at each stage. The five stages cover the period from correspondence learning in the 19th century to the present era of interactive online learning. It then examines how the term “open learning” has been defined in published wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three most common principal subjects in the 39 reviewed papers were: exercises to define and describe e-learning as a concept (Adam et al, 2013;Al Zahrani & Kumar, 2015;Cardona-Román & Sánchez-Torres, 2011;Crescente & Lee, 2011;Denham et al, 2012;Grant, 2019;Hartley & Andújar, 2022;Ismuratova et al, 2017;Kergel & Heidkamp-Kergel, 2021;Khoury et al, 2011;Kumar Basak et al, 2018;Li, 2018;Mirmoghtadaie et al, 2019;Moore et al, 2011;Nagy, 2016;Rodrigues et al, 2019;Vagarinho, 2020;Vagarinho, 2018)); descriptions of the concept or implementation of specific e-learning programmes (Al-rahmi et al, 2015;Arzayeva et al, 2015;Kobewka et al, 2014;Launay-Vacher & Rieutord, 2014;Lewis et al, 2014;Martínez-Gómez et al, 2022); and, the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or semantic web technology to suggest and provide learning objects based on a learner's requirements (Ahmed et al, 2018;Kavitha & Lohani, 2019;Moubayed et al, 2018;Sengupta et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three most common principal subjects in the 39 reviewed papers were: exercises to define and describe e-learning as a concept (Adam et al, 2013;Al Zahrani & Kumar, 2015;Cardona-Román & Sánchez-Torres, 2011;Crescente & Lee, 2011;Denham et al, 2012;Grant, 2019;Hartley & Andújar, 2022;Ismuratova et al, 2017;Kergel & Heidkamp-Kergel, 2021;Khoury et al, 2011;Kumar Basak et al, 2018;Li, 2018;Mirmoghtadaie et al, 2019;Moore et al, 2011;Nagy, 2016;Rodrigues et al, 2019;Vagarinho, 2020;Vagarinho, 2018)); descriptions of the concept or implementation of specific e-learning programmes (Al-rahmi et al, 2015;Arzayeva et al, 2015;Kobewka et al, 2014;Launay-Vacher & Rieutord, 2014;Lewis et al, 2014;Martínez-Gómez et al, 2022); and, the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or semantic web technology to suggest and provide learning objects based on a learner's requirements (Ahmed et al, 2018;Kavitha & Lohani, 2019;Moubayed et al, 2018;Sengupta et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%