2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6611(02)00064-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of oceanic and atmospheric anomalies in the northeast Pacific during the El Niño and La Niña events of 1995–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
131
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
131
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, positive anomalies lasting in 1999 become weak after 2000 and then strong again in 2002; negative anomalies, which are expected to occur subsequently, are not found. This warming trend of JES is supposed to be a local demonstration associated with recent global warming since the late 1990s (McPhaden, 2002;Minobe, 2002;Schwing et al, 2002;CLIVAR, 2003;Oelke et al, 2004).…”
Section: Temporal Variability At Maximum Correlation Be-mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, positive anomalies lasting in 1999 become weak after 2000 and then strong again in 2002; negative anomalies, which are expected to occur subsequently, are not found. This warming trend of JES is supposed to be a local demonstration associated with recent global warming since the late 1990s (McPhaden, 2002;Minobe, 2002;Schwing et al, 2002;CLIVAR, 2003;Oelke et al, 2004).…”
Section: Temporal Variability At Maximum Correlation Be-mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The statistical forecast is constructed using a multiple linear regression, where the observed SST anomaly at a given initialization month and lead time is fit as a function of both the CCS and Niño 3.4 SST anomalies the month prior to forecast initialization. For example, a statistical forecast of June initialized in February (4-month lead time) would fit the observed June SST anomalies as a function of the CCS and Niño 3.4 SST anomalies in January events, with El Niño (La Niña) conditions typically bringing reduced (increased) upwelling intensity and consequently positive (negative) SST anomalies (Jacox et al 2015b;Schwing et al 2002). This atmospheric teleconnection is fast, with the CCS response lagging the tropics by a few weeks to a month, and upwelling anomalies during ENSO events typically persisting through ~April (Alexander et al 2002;Jacox et al 2015b).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Sst Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the influence of the strong 1997/1998 El Niño and subsequent La Niña on the coastal upwelling ecosystem of the US west coast has been well documented by a variety of observational studies that focus on the physics and hydrography (e.g., Collins et al, 2002;Kosro, 2002;Lynn and Bograd, 2002;Ryan and Noble, 2002;Schwing et al, 2002b), on nutrients and primary production (e.g., Castro et al, 2002;Mitchell, 2000, 2002;Kudela and Chavez, 2002), and on zooplankton and higher trophic levels (e.g., Benson et al, 2002;Hopcroft et al, 2002;Pearcy, 2002;Peterson et al, 2002). A handful of observational studies have investigated the impact of the 1982/1983 El Niño on the physical regime of the CalCS (e.g., Simpson, 1983;Huyer and Smith, 1985) and the effect of the 2002/2003 El Niño on the physics and biology (e.g., Murphree et al, 2003;Schwing et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%