The Evolution of Modern Cardiac Surgery and the Necessity to Change

Reichenspurner, Hermann

doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000253

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The time restriction we applied to the searches reflected the deep changes cardiac surgery has undergone in the recent period. 9 The Data Team conducted the searches during December 2018 to January 2019 and reviewed all the identified information. Relevant literature was collated for each indicative question, and the results were reviewed by the Steering Group to decide if enough current evidence was available to categorise a question as answered.…”

Section: Processing Submitted Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo identify research priorities that address the needs of people affected by cardiac surgery and those who support and care for them.DesignJames Lind Alliance (JLA) process—two surveys and a consensus workshop guided by an independent JLA adviser.SettingThe UK with international participation.ParticipantsThree stakeholder groups—heart surgery patients, carers and healthcare professionals involved in care delivery.MethodsThe initial survey was set to collect potential research questions in cardiac surgery as identified by stakeholders. Submitted questions were summarised into indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to verify that these indicative questions had not been answered. In the second survey, stakeholders then voted for their top 10 from the list of unanswered questions. The top voted questions were taken forward for final ranking in a workshop.ResultsIn the initial survey, 629 respondents (28% patients/carers, 62% healthcare professionals) submitted 1082 potential questions. Of these, 797 in-scope questions were summarised into 49 indicative questions and of which 45 had not been answered by existing research. In the second survey, 492 respondents (43% patients/carers, 49% healthcare professionals) cast their votes with the top 12 from each of the three stakeholder groups totalling 21 questions advancing to the final priority setting workshop. The workshop attended by 25 delegates (10 patients/carers and 15 healthcare professionals) agreed on the top 10 research questions including long-term outcomes (quality of life), and aspects from preoperative personalised care (prehabilitation, frailty, comorbidities), intraoperative management (minimally invasive techniques), to prevention and management of postoperative complications (organ injury, atrial fibrillation, infection).ConclusionsThis Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) identified the priorities and unmet needs of patients and clinicians in cardiac surgery. The next step is to disseminate and implement the PSP results to ensure that these priorities shape future research and improve clinical services.

show abstract

Section: Processing Submitted Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…have developed over the past decade (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). As the limits of what is possible continue to be challenged, minimally invasive approaches rival the open, maximally invasive surgical techniques which have been established as the "gold standard".…”

Section: Techniques In Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (Mics)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of patient related factors, cardiac surgery has not been immune to the modern wave of patient driven demand for less invasive procedures and their potential benefits of improved cosmesis, decreased pain, less recovery time, and faster return to work or daily activities (3). Similarly, surgical providers seek to advance surgical procedures and technologies not only to provide the best possible options for their patients in terms of treating disease in the least harmful way possible, but also to stay relevant in a field that is ever-changing (1,2,6). Finally, the cost burden of healthcare in the United States continues to grow at an alarming rate.…”

Section: Techniques In Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (Mics)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive translational research model and cadaveric simulation: where minimally invasive cardiac surgery and industry meet

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Focused research targeting an identified clinical problem may result in more rapid development of medical devices, technologies, and surgical techniques that directly impact patient care. These medical advances to improve patient care may be expedited by adopting an interactive translational research model in which inventors, designers, and engineers work in collaboration with surgeons. In addition, cadaveric simulation is a high-fidelity model that is bridging the translational and logistical gap to bring new surgical devices, technologies, and techniques to patients. We describe the partnership between the University of Rochester and LSI SOLUTIONS in which an interactive translational research model utilizing cadaveric simulation has been successfully applied to accelerate bringing minimally invasive cardiac surgical techniques and innovative devices to patients.

show abstract

Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults

Abbasciano

Roman

Rizzello

et al. 2020

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Evolution of Modern Cardiac Surgery and the Necessity to Change

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery

Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery

Interactive translational research model and cadaveric simulation: where minimally invasive cardiac surgery and industry meet

Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About