2014
DOI: 10.9734/arrb/2014/7697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Integrative Insect Systematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, arthropod DNA barcoding does not replace the classical approach of morphology-based species identification (Hebert and Gregory 2005;Pires and Marinoni 2010). The combination of both techniques has proven successful in numerous cases (Pires and Marinoni 2010;Okiwelu and Noutcha 2014;Kirichenko et al 2015) and should be applied also in sentinel nurseries and plantations (Roques et al 2015).…”
Section: Sentinel Nurseriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, arthropod DNA barcoding does not replace the classical approach of morphology-based species identification (Hebert and Gregory 2005;Pires and Marinoni 2010). The combination of both techniques has proven successful in numerous cases (Pires and Marinoni 2010;Okiwelu and Noutcha 2014;Kirichenko et al 2015) and should be applied also in sentinel nurseries and plantations (Roques et al 2015).…”
Section: Sentinel Nurseriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a main problem in entomological studies is the difficulty in identifying closely related species (Okiwelu and Noutcha 2014), chromosomal data have provided ample opportunities for taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses of many insect groups (Miao andHua 2017, Soldán andPutz 2000). Cytogenetic studies have detected fundamental patterns in chromosome evolution that have assisted in the systematic analyses of many taxa (Camargo et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%