The transhumanist movement is characterized by a shift from the traditional understanding of
the “created” and “born” human to a “produced” and potentially “immortal” human. This
article argues that the reproductive policy of transhumanism is inconsistent because, on the
one hand, firstly, it discredits the implications of reproduction, especially those related to
women, such as pregnancy, childbirth, and childrearing, which is considered a source of pain
at every stage. Additionally, it prioritizes adult enhancement in pursuit of immortality, which
is why it discards producing a new life. On the other hand, the movement utilizes new
reproductive technologies to enhance human beings, thereby promising and providing
unlimited individual reproductive freedom in a wide range of contexts. Furthermore, this
article argues that transhumanism, which moves away from the concept of sexual human
nature, not only excludes femininity and its associated nature but also converges towards a
sexless human nature biologically. It also discharges sexuality from the purpose of
reproduction and reduces it to the purpose of pleasure substantially. The overall attitude of the
transhumanist context raises significant ethical problems, undermining traditional medical
ethics and bioethics principles such as nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy, justice, and
human dignity. Moreover, it forces ethical principles to be redefined on a new basis with its
indifferent attitude that ignores the threat of authoritarian eugenics, neglects reproductive
responsibility while emphasizing reproductive freedom, and fails to consider the nature of
contrast-dependency of human values. As a result, new ethical principles must be developed
to address the implications of this attitude.