2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Geriatric Oncology and Geriatric Assessment over the Past Decade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows patient characteristics obtained by the GA-patient tool. The mean score of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living was 12.1 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The mean score of comorbidity scale was 6.5 (range, 1-12).…”
Section: Geriatric Assessment-patient Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows patient characteristics obtained by the GA-patient tool. The mean score of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living was 12.1 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The mean score of comorbidity scale was 6.5 (range, 1-12).…”
Section: Geriatric Assessment-patient Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignancies occur at any age, but the incidence of cancer increases with age and is more common in elderly patients. Cancer is the leading cause of death among men and women aged 60-79 years; 60% of newly diagnosed cancers are seen in patients aged 65 and over, and 70% of cancer deaths occur in this age group [1,2]. Due to demographic changes (population aging and increasing life expectancy), the proportion of elderly cancer patients is expected to increase further in the coming decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGAs provide a means for identifying these needs early so that appropriate intervention and care planning can occur ( Culakova et al, 2023 ; Doi et al, 2023 ; Lin et al, 2023 ; Singhal et al, 2023 ). CGAs are “multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process[es] focusing on determining an older person’s medical, psychosocial, and functional capabilities to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long-term follow-up” ( Ellis et al, 2017 ; Hamaker et al, 2022 ; Outlaw et al, 2022 ). While much work has been done to develop recommendations for CGAs using validated instruments ( Mohile et al, 2018 ; Hamaker et al, 2022 ; Dale et al, 2023 ), research on the actual implementation of CGA processes within primary and specialty care settings for vulnerable populations of aging cancer survivors is lagging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%