The Evolution of External Healthcare Regulation in England; From Performance Oversight to Supporting Improvement; Comment on "The Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Provider Regimes in the English NHS: A Rapid Evaluation of a National Improvement Initiative for Failing Healthcare Organisations"

Abstract

The Special Measures and Challenged Provider (SMCP) Regime introduced for struggling healthcare organisations in England represents a subtle shift to the scope of external regulation from performance oversight to include supporting internal service improvement. External regulation alone has a had a mixed impact on the quality of care and Vindrola-Padros et al’s study highlights that externally driven improvement initiatives may also struggle to succeed in turning around performance. Principally, this is due to a failure in acknowledgment that poor performance results from a myriad of external and internal factors which coalesce to impede organisational performance. A struggling organisation may be indicative of wider issues in the local health and care system. Whole systems approaches to improvement with collaboration across providers and the effective use of data may support struggling organisations but their role maybe tempered with the increased centralisation of the delivery of improvement regimes such as SMCP.

Generative AI as Virtual Healthcare Assistant for Enhancing Patient Care Quality

“…Patient dissatisfaction has increased due to subpar patient care, which negatively affects healthcare systems and patient outcomes [18]. There is a growing interest in deploying virtual healthcare assistants to tackle these challenges [19].…”

The state of care in England’s maternity services

“…The CQC has wide ranging powers of enforcement under civil or criminal law where needed, but responsibility for improving challenged organisations lies elsewhere, and evidence for the effectiveness of the current improvement mechanisms remains limited. Of the 41 NHS hospitals under the “special measures and challenged providers” regime6 between 2013 and 2018, only six were rated good by mid-2018, with six re-entering the regime 7…”