1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of empty nuptial gifts in a dance fly, Empis snoddyi (Diptera: Empididae): bigger isn't always better

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like many other assessments of sexual selection in insects including dance flies (Sadowski et al. , 1999; LeBas et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like many other assessments of sexual selection in insects including dance flies (Sadowski et al. , 1999; LeBas et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copulating pair then rest on nearby vegetation while the female probes the nuptial gift with her proboscis (Cumming 1994; Preston‐Mafham 1999). A diverse range of nuptial gifts are found in the Empidinae, from unwrapped, edible insect prey, edible prey in a silken ‘balloon’, balloons containing dried insects or inedible algae, to empty and inedible balloons made of bubbles or silk strands secreted by the male (reviewed by Cumming 1994; Vahed 1998; Sadowski et al. 1999, see also Young & Merritt 2003).…”
Section: Sensory Bias and Nuptial Gift Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably as a consequence, females in many species compete intensely for the food gifts provided by males, and females have evolved a series of remarkable secondary sex characters that appear to improve their attractiveness to males (Collin, ; Cumming, ; Funk & Tallamy, ; LeBas, Hockham, & Ritchie, ; Murray, Wheeler, Gwynne, & Bussiere, ; Wheeler, Gwynne, & Bussière, ). In spite of the strong predicted covariance between sexual trait expression and mating success, studies of sexual selection on female dance flies report remarkable variation in the form and strength of selection (Bussière, Gwynne, & Brooks, ; Funk & Tallamy, ; LeBas et al., ; Sadowski, Moore, & Brodie, ; Wheeler et al., ). Whereas some studies have shown mating advantages for females with large ornaments (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%