The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: the Thai educational paradox

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze critically the evolution of educational reform in Thailand. Three major phases are identified. The special focus of the paper is an assessment of the third reform which began with the passage of the Office of the National Education Commission (ONEC) (2002).Design/methodology/approachThe methodology for the study is mixed methods including document analysis, direct participant observation, and compilation of major statistical performance indicators from diverse sources.FindingsThe success of the most recent reform has been clearly mixed. Major structural and legal changes have occurred but overall system performance remains disappointingly low, despite large Thai educational expenditures as a percent of national budget and the presence of much impressive educational leadership talent. The paper identifies what is called the “Thai educational paradox”. The essence of the paradox is Thailand’s failure to achieve its educational potential. The paper identifies key factors explaining the paradox.Originality/valueThe paper has significant theoretical, policy, and practical implications. From a theoretical perspective, the study confirms the persistence of strong regional disparities and a lack of fiscal neutrality associated with a neoliberal model of capitalistic development. From a practical policy perspective, it is imperative for Thailand to improve the overall quality of its educational system and to reduce regional disparities. There have been numerous studies of each of Thailand’s three phases of reform, but this paper’s original contribution is its presentation of a historical, interdisciplinary, and integrated perspective on the evolution of educational reform and the many obstacles associated with its implementation.

Teacher and Learner Views on Effective English Teaching in the Thai Context: The Case of Engineering Students

“…The qualitative information also confirmed the preferred characteristics of teachers as perceived by students-that the teachers should be fun, fair, patient, cheerful, generous, flexible, friendly, open-minded, and energetic. These findings are in line with the Thai character of wanting to have fun and being fond of pleasure (Fry, 2002;Nguyen, n.d.). However, creating enjoyable activities in the classroom is not easy.…”

School Belonging in Different Cultures: The Effects of Individualism and Power Distance

“…According to the Confucian philosophy human ability is malleable, great weight is placed on improving ability through effort (Stevenson and Lee, 1990). At the same time, East Asian schools have also been described as examination driven and traditional-if not old-fashioned-with regards to curriculum and teaching style, and the authority of teachers (Leung, 2001;Fry and Bi, 2013). Teaching is teachercentered, and student involvement is minimal as is group work among students (Fry and Bi, 2013).…”

School autonomy and accountability in Thailand: Does the gap between policy intent and implementation matter?

“…Several people have offered explanations for this paradox, including: (1) student-centered learning is yet to be implemented because of strong cultural barriers (Fry and Bi 2013); (2) political instability has led to institutional uncertainties in education (Tan 2007); (3) misalignments exist between national education goals and national education management (Pongwat and Rupavijetra 2011); and (4) stakeholders/policy-makers have treated policy reform as an event instead of as a process (Hallinger and Lee 2011).…”

“…what some analysts call the ''Thai paradox'', where the country has made large investments in physical resources and human resources in education are of good quality, but learning outcomes have remained low (Fry and Bi 2013).…”