2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.wep.2013.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of co-opetition in the Waipara wine cluster of New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategic alliances are seen by many authors (Arend, 2009;Khalid and Larimo, 2012;Dana et al, 2013;Dana and Mallet, 2014;Bouncken et al, 2015) as a determinant factor of improved firm performance (Stuart, 2000), but the establishment of strategic alliances is a complex and…”
Section: Strategic Alliances and Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic alliances are seen by many authors (Arend, 2009;Khalid and Larimo, 2012;Dana et al, 2013;Dana and Mallet, 2014;Bouncken et al, 2015) as a determinant factor of improved firm performance (Stuart, 2000), but the establishment of strategic alliances is a complex and…”
Section: Strategic Alliances and Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors argue that coopetition is a dynamic relation that evolves over time (Gnyawali and Madhavan, 2001;Loch et al, 2006;Dagnino and Padula, 2007;Bengtsson and Johansson, 2012) but there is a gap in the understanding of this evolution and it calls for in depth case studies (Bengtsson and Johansson, 2012 ;Dana et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evolution seems to be linked to the transformation of the firms' behaviors that socially construct a new environment through their interactions (Porac et al, 1989). Many scholars argue that the coopetition process could be animated by numerous behaviors and emotions that could change over time (Loch et al, 2006;Bengtsson and Johansson, 2012;Dana et al, 2013). These authors argued that studying the development of the coopetition process via longitudinal studies is essential (Bengtsson and Johansson, 2012).…”
Section: The Emergence and The Evolution Of Coopetitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a dynamic process, this engagement raises the question of temporality. The temporality of engaging in and managing coopetition remains almost unexplored up to now (Bengtsson, Eriksson, & Wincent, 2010) except in the study by Dana, Granata, Lasch, and Carnaby (2013). From a more dynamic perspective, they have shown that in wine clusters, coopetition evolves toward greater cooperation, which stifles competition among entrepreneurs.…”
Section: Review Of Literature On Coopetition and Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%