1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80122-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of brood reduction by siblicide in birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infanticide has been reported in white stork as a drastic means of brood reduction ( Schüz 1984; Tortosa & Redondo 1992), but we did not observe it in this study. Siblicide is another possible direct means of brood reduction ( Godfray & Harper 1990; Rodriguez‐Girones 1996): here, we suggest that individual differences in behaviour of the chicks may indirectly determine the survival of their siblings.…”
Section: High Plasma Testosterone Concentrations Are a Hormonal Meansmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Infanticide has been reported in white stork as a drastic means of brood reduction ( Schüz 1984; Tortosa & Redondo 1992), but we did not observe it in this study. Siblicide is another possible direct means of brood reduction ( Godfray & Harper 1990; Rodriguez‐Girones 1996): here, we suggest that individual differences in behaviour of the chicks may indirectly determine the survival of their siblings.…”
Section: High Plasma Testosterone Concentrations Are a Hormonal Meansmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, when brood reduction occurs, the benefit in fledging condition accrued by each surviving chick may outweigh any gain in inclusive fitness to that chick had the brood not been reduced. Consequently, parents and older nestlings are expected to disagree about whether brood reduction should occur, at least when food is plentiful (O'Connor 1978;Parker and Mock 1987;Godfray and Harper 1990;Clutton-Brock 1991). Our finding that the extent of jockeying for position is correlated with the occurrence of brood reduction is consistent with the idea that sibling competition affects the outcome of this conflict of interests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominants that selfishly consume the largest share of food provided by parents can benefit from increased growth and survival, whereas subordinates may suffer reduced growth and survival [3,4]. Theoretically, siblings should avoid escalated conflicts by adhering to dominance conventions based on differences in resource-holding power, unless the benefits outweigh their costs [5,6]. Competitive asymmetries may be conferred by birth order in avian species with marked asynchronous hatching [7,8], or by intrinsic factors such as fighting ability [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%