The rapid technological transformation of society over the past 3 decades has had significant influence on the practice of psychiatry. 1 In their personal and professional spheres, psychiatrists now must master relationships across multiple technology platforms and settings. To successfully manage these hybrid physician-patient relationships, psychiatrists need to have an appreciation for the strengths, limitations, and adaptations needed for each technology they use to interface with patients. 2 There is a rapidly expanding body of literature informing the use of technology in psychiatric treatment. 3 Certain technologies, such as videoconferencing, or telepsychiatry, are long-standing, have a robust evidence base with numerous published clinical guidelines, and have been widely deployed in practice, while for other technologies, the literature is relatively nascent (eg, mobile apps). 2,4 The general medical literature provides lessons for addressing ethical and boundary issues arising from technology. 5 All psychiatrists should be familiar with technologies in widespread use, or base technologies (eg, email, mobile, electronic health records, videoconferencing), as well as technologies beginning to be more widely adapted, or emerging technologies (eg, patient portals, apps, web-assisted therapy). 2 Psychiatrists should develop expertise with, implement, and continuously monitor technology in their practice and make sure to set clear expectations and direction for their patients around the use of technology in clinician-patient interactions. Proffered here is a progressive 3-step framework to evaluate and manage technology in psychiatric practice in the context of these hybrid physician-patient relationships. These components are (1) administrative, (2) operational, and (3) clinical.Key domains of the administrative components encompass legal, regulatory, and technological requirements. Common considerations across technologies include privacy and security rules (as mandated by federal, state, regulatory bodies, and institutional or organizational policy); technology requirements, such as bandwidth, access, and equipment; and adapting technology to regulatory and malpractice requirements, jurisdiction, and formal or informal processes for patient consent and education. 6 The details of these considerations vary widely across technologies and settings. For example, some states require written informed consent for telepsychiatry services (but not for other technologies [eg, text messaging, patient portals, emails, mobile telephones]), while other states do not. These administrative considerations, especially the legal and regulatory standards, set the foundation and structures for operationalizing a technology into practice.Psychiatrists in solo or group psychiatric practices create the operational components for a technology by accounting for a technology's administrative considerations, intended use, clinical setting, users, and communication protocols, synthesizing these into a functional construct for clinical...