Evoked Brain Potentials and Behavior 1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3462-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evoked Response as a Measure of Cerebral Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, altered SNAPs were most often observed in patients exhibiting sensory signs or symptoms, or were sometimes related to associated medical conditions (polyneuropathy, median or ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathies) 12 20 25 27–30. In line with this, the various components of cortical SEPs are not altered unequally, whether in amplitude and/or latency, and given the multiple origins of the SEP components,31 some authors have suggested that abnormal SEPs in ALS are not due to sensory defects but to abnormal cortico-cortical interactions 24 32…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, altered SNAPs were most often observed in patients exhibiting sensory signs or symptoms, or were sometimes related to associated medical conditions (polyneuropathy, median or ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathies) 12 20 25 27–30. In line with this, the various components of cortical SEPs are not altered unequally, whether in amplitude and/or latency, and given the multiple origins of the SEP components,31 some authors have suggested that abnormal SEPs in ALS are not due to sensory defects but to abnormal cortico-cortical interactions 24 32…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous information strongly suggests that this effect represents an amplitude depression of components within the detoxified group rather than enhanced amplitudes in intoxicated persons. Several investigators have reported that abstinent alcoholics display lower voltage amplitudes of the N1 component (Dustman et al 1979;Begleiter 1979, 1980;Begleiter et al 1980), the P2 component (Porjesz and Begleiter 1981;Posthuma and Visser 1982), and the N2-P3 deflection (Porjesz and Begleiter 1982). While the exact relation of the N2P3 deflection to information processing is unclear, it is likely to reflect encoding of information from sensory store to working memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recordings were carried out with silver-silver chloride electrodes placed at Erb's point (EP), CVII, and P3/P4 postcentral cortical zones 7 cm lateral to Cz and 3 cm behind the Cz-ear line; these active derivations, contralateral to the stimulated nerve, were referred to the Fz electrode (often the EP lead was referred to a noncephalic (NC) site). SEPs were also obtained with central (C3/C4) and frontal (F3/F4) electrodes according to the [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] International System. For all scalp leads, includ-ing the postrolandic ones, the ipsilateral earlobe was chosen as the reference instead of Fz in order to record the cortical potentials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%