2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/kjnvz
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evidence for good genes ovulatory shifts in Arslan et al. (2018) is mixed and uncertain

Abstract: In Arslan et al. (2018), we reported ovulatory increases in extra-pair sexual desire, in-pair sexual desire, and self-perceived desirability, as well as several moderator analyses related to the good genes ovulatory shift hypothesis, which predicts attenuated ovulatory increases in extra-pair desire for women with attractive partners. Gangestad and Dinh (2021) identified errors in how we aggregated two out of four main moderator variables. We are grateful that their scrutiny uncovered these errors. After corre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is LCA occuring not at the stripe edges, but rather within the stripe at the front facet, which can be explained by lateral spatial hole burning and thermal lensing in the presence of longitudinal temperature variation. This can result in non-ideal overlap between the lateral carrier and optical profiles and therefore lower gain [28,29].…”
Section: Measurement Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is LCA occuring not at the stripe edges, but rather within the stripe at the front facet, which can be explained by lateral spatial hole burning and thermal lensing in the presence of longitudinal temperature variation. This can result in non-ideal overlap between the lateral carrier and optical profiles and therefore lower gain [28,29].…”
Section: Measurement Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For P opt > 12.5W it is a combination of a narrow near-field and reduced far-field angle compared to the contact implantation devices which leads to the improved brightness in the BRIS devices. It is not necessarily clear why at these high-powers the BRIS devices has narrower far-field, we suggest that it is possible due to current spreading leading to the large carrier accumulation at the stripe edges in these devices [34], increasing the gain available for the lasing of higher order modes as proposed in [17].…”
Section: Beam Quality Measurementmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Upon completion of all sessions, participants received a payment of 80€ or course credit. Participants were invited to take part in a parallel, but separate online diary study (Arslan, Driebe, et al, 2020) from which we were able to match data for n = 142 participants to use measures of self‐reported personality traits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%