2014
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2014.32.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Vocal Pitch Accuracy

Abstract: THE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF WESTERN OPERATIC singing voices indicates that professional singers can be particularly ''out of tune.'' This study aims to better understand the evaluation of operatic voices, which have particularly complex acoustical signals. Twentytwo music experts were asked to evaluate the vocal pitch accuracy of 14 sung performances with a pairwise comparison paradigm, in a test and a retest. In addition to the objective measurement of pitch accuracy (pitch interval deviation), several performa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, the proportion of singers demonstrating poor singing abilities reaches more than 50% when the threshold is set at 50 cents (Loui, Demorest, Pfordresher, & Iyer, 2015; Pfordresher & Larrouy-Maestri, 2015). Therefore, one can assume that several factors linked to the performer (see Larrouy-Maestri, in press, for a review), his or her attire (Griffiths, 2010) or behavior (Thompson & Russo, 2007; Waddell & Williamon, 2017), the mode of presentation (i.e., visual and/or auditory, Tsay, 2013) or listeners’ expectations (Anglada-Tort & Müllensiefen, 2017; Kroger & Margulis, 2017) might modulate correctness category. The effects of non-musical variables on listeners’ tolerance would have to be specifically examined to adapt the definition of correctness to more natural settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, the proportion of singers demonstrating poor singing abilities reaches more than 50% when the threshold is set at 50 cents (Loui, Demorest, Pfordresher, & Iyer, 2015; Pfordresher & Larrouy-Maestri, 2015). Therefore, one can assume that several factors linked to the performer (see Larrouy-Maestri, in press, for a review), his or her attire (Griffiths, 2010) or behavior (Thompson & Russo, 2007; Waddell & Williamon, 2017), the mode of presentation (i.e., visual and/or auditory, Tsay, 2013) or listeners’ expectations (Anglada-Tort & Müllensiefen, 2017; Kroger & Margulis, 2017) might modulate correctness category. The effects of non-musical variables on listeners’ tolerance would have to be specifically examined to adapt the definition of correctness to more natural settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of correctness outlined here might not be adequate for highly trained voices, such as operatic voices. Indeed, such an acoustic signal is highly complex (Larrouy-Maestri, Magis, & Morsomme, 2014a) and the notion of pitch accuracy is not only based on pitch deviations between tones but relies on the association of several parameters such as energy distribution and vibrato (Larrouy-Maestri, Magis, & Morsomme, 2014b; Larrouy-Maestri, Morsomme, Magis, & Poeppel, 2017). In addition, specific tones might be purposely mistuned for expressive purpose (Sundberg et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic analyses. Acoustic analysis followed the procedure extensively described in (18,50,51), using AudioSculpt 2.9.4v3 software, OpenMusic 6.3 software (IRCAM, Paris, France) and Praat (52) (Version 6.0.46). The following parameters were analysed: pitch interval deviation (average of pitch deviations between the expected and performed intervals along the melody); vibrato rate (number of quasiperiodic modulations of the F0 per second, in Hz); vibrato extent (amplitude of the F0 variations within the same tone, in cents); energy distribution (energy of the 2.4-5.4 kHz band divided by the energy across the 0-10 kHz band -the rationale behind this computation is that a high score in the energy distribution variable indicates a strong reinforcement of the band containing the singer's formant); jitter (local; perturbation in the F0 from cycle to cycle); shimmer (local; perturbation in the amplitude of the F0 from cycle to cycle); average tempo (excerpt's length divided by the number of beats).…”
Section: Audio Processing and Stimulus Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly for the singing voice, there is evidence that specific acoustic features influence the perception of pitch accuracy, or of singing performances as "correct" (18) and that the use of such features is affected by the music expertise of the listeners (19,20) -but such research does not answer questions about singing preferences. In fact, aesthetic appreciation probably goes beyond correctness, that is to say, people do not attend concerts to hear 'correct' performances, but to enjoy them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With that condition, the improvement level is difficult to trace. Some studies have been working in the scientific field of performance analysis of the voice with acoustic features as parameters [7]- [10]. Previous research has proposed an automatic singing evaluating system based on acoustic features and rhythm [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%