2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Videos about Branched-Chain Amino Acids Supplements on YouTube™: A Multi-Approach Study

Abstract: Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) are one of the most controversial ergogenic aids in terms of effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and reliability of BCAA supplements related to English videos on YouTubeä and to synthesize with the sentiment–emotion analysis of comments on videos. The content analysis of the information on videos was evaluated with the use of DISCERN, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). In addition, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, videos from academic institutions and healthcare information websites had higher reliability and quality. These results are compatible with many studies evaluating patient information videos on YouTube 11,19–21 . However, there is also research evaluating YouTube videos as a useful resource for patients 6,9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, videos from academic institutions and healthcare information websites had higher reliability and quality. These results are compatible with many studies evaluating patient information videos on YouTube 11,19–21 . However, there is also research evaluating YouTube videos as a useful resource for patients 6,9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Various aspects of video sources and features were compared within the framework of these scoring systems. Academic institutions and healthcare professionals tended to produce more reliable and high-quality videos compared to other sources [8,12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%