2012
DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2010.509067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Variable-Injection Rate Waterflooding, Immiscible CO2Flooding, and Water-alternating-CO2Injection for Heavy Oil Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WAG recovered as much as 34.5% of OOIP, while CGI recovered up to 15%. This conclusion was also supported by a recent study …”
Section: Advances In Scientific Researchsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WAG recovered as much as 34.5% of OOIP, while CGI recovered up to 15%. This conclusion was also supported by a recent study …”
Section: Advances In Scientific Researchsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Th is conclusion was also supported by a recent study. 36 In 2010, CO 2 injection was coupled with polymer injection. 37 Th e test oil had a gravity of 18.3°API and a viscosity of 353 cP at 24°C.…”
Section: Advances In Scientifi C Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CO 2 injection is a wellestablished oil recovery method applied to light oil reservoirs, it can be an effective EOR technique for cold heavy oil production, including waterflooding, immiscible CO 2 flooding, and CO 2 water-alternating gas (WAG) (Mai et al, 2009;Nasehi and Asghari, 2010;Tchambak et al, 2012;Torabi et al, 2012). CO 2 is not expected to be miscible with heavy oil and hence the reservoir sweep efficiency is generally lower than that for conventional reservoirs.…”
Section: Miscible Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different reservoir properties, many researchers have designed a variety of CO 2 flooding simulation experimental devices to study the mechanisms underlying changes in the physical properties of reservoirs that are caused by CO 2 flooding and to simulate the effect of CO 2 flooding under physical conditions. Researchers have obtained the key parameters of the range of miscible displacement by using these experiments [29][30][31][32][33] . In addition to physical experiments, many component models used for CO 2 flooding have been established, and numerical simulation technology has also been widely used in the evaluation and prediction of the effects of CO 2 flooding.…”
Section: Influencing Factors and Application Prospects Of Co 2 Floodimentioning
confidence: 99%