The evaluation of the expert competence in field of metrology difference methods

Comparative assessment of the competence of experts in the field of higher education by different methods

“…The uncertainty range in these data may be limited by using independent methods or consistency checks. A detailed description of the methods of DU and AHP was presented in [22][23][24][25].…”

“…The basic AHP [16][17][18] and its modifications [21] are applicable only in the case of a small number of given alternatives and do not make it possible to combine different opinions of expert groups. Therefore, on the basis of the AHP described in [22][23][24][25], specialized software "Competence AHP 1.0" (Ukraine) was developed, which can be used to assess the competence of experts in different fields of activity.…”

“…In [22][23][24][25], the methodology for quantifying the competence of experts, taking into account the characteristics of data uncertainty (DU), which can be used for a comparative assessment of the competence level of experts in various fields of activity, is described. Appropriate criteria for the ball's assessment of the competence of experts in a particular field of activity to implement this methodology are established.…”

“…Appropriate criteria for the ball's assessment of the competence of experts in a particular field of activity to implement this methodology are established. Specialized software "Competence DU 2.1" (Ukraine) on the basis of the method described in [22][23][24][25] was developed. In the methodology and software "Competence DU 2.1", a number of mathematical indicators for each expert, the reference value of the estimation and its general standard uncertainty are calculated.…”

“…Using specialized software "Competence DU 2.1" and "Competence AHP 1.0" (Ukraine), quantitative indicators of the competence of experts were evaluated [22][23][24][25]. The results of the assessment of the competence of these experts are shown in Table 3.…”