1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)84546-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of probabilistic classification methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to explain the complementary behavior of these two classification methods, the "inside model space" (IMS) and "outside model space" (OMS) defined by Van Der Voet et al is used (10). During principal component analysis of a training set, a set of eigenvectors is produced that can be divided into two sets: a primary set of eigenvectors that span the "inside model space" of the training set and a secondary set of eigenvectors that span the "outside model space" of the training set.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explain the complementary behavior of these two classification methods, the "inside model space" (IMS) and "outside model space" (OMS) defined by Van Der Voet et al is used (10). During principal component analysis of a training set, a set of eigenvectors is produced that can be divided into two sets: a primary set of eigenvectors that span the "inside model space" of the training set and a secondary set of eigenvectors that span the "outside model space" of the training set.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%