2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1225-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of primary stenting of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of crural arteries

Abstract: A comparison was made of sirolimus-eluting stents and bare stents as an effective means of treatment of stenosis in crural arteries. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: (1) patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and (2) patients treated with bare stents. Each group consisted of 25 patients, and every patient had one stent implanted. All patients showed symptoms of ischemia of the peripheral arteries, classified according to the Rutherford scale into categories 3, 4, and 5. All patients were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Since the first use of stent in the infrapopliteal artery in 1993, 23 stent implantation in the infrapopliteal territory is rapidly growing. The emergence of DES encouraged the application of stenting in infrapopliteal disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Since the first use of stent in the infrapopliteal artery in 1993, 23 stent implantation in the infrapopliteal territory is rapidly growing. The emergence of DES encouraged the application of stenting in infrapopliteal disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of small numbers of patients with CLI suggest sirolimus-eluting balloonmounted stents in the crural vessels retain a significant advantage over bare-metal (steel) stents at 6-month follow-up in terms of restenosis (16 vs 76%) and the need for target lesion revascularization [47]. This is important, as the options for endovascular reintervention are markedly limited once reocclusion occurs.…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another treatment attracting much interest is stent implantation [21][22][23][24] including the application of drug eluting stent. [25][26][27] From these valuable researches, it can be learned that endovascular stenting is an effective approach to avoid the problems after balloon angioplasty, such as early elastic recoil, residual stenosis and flow limiting dissection. And stenting combined with revascularization is a feasible and safe therapy providing a good short-term vascular patency rate and hemodynamic improvements (ankle-brachial index, treadmill walking distance, etc) to treat critical limb ischemia.…”
Section: Treatment Program Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%