1961
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1961.11777659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Ph.D. Dissertations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evident was a reluctance to alter degree requirements, such as cutting course requirements, fixing the duration of PhD studies, or replacing the dissertation with other peer-reviewed work. This is an intriguing result, given ongoing debate within several disciplines about the purpose and value of the PhD dissertation in achieving the goals of the degree (Anderson, 1961;Monaghan, 1989). A comprehensive survey of graduate schools in Europe by the UK Council for Graduate Education (1998) found that approximately half of universities in the UK have a second set of regulations for the award of the degree of PhD, which allow the candidate's thesis to consist entirely or largely of published work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Evident was a reluctance to alter degree requirements, such as cutting course requirements, fixing the duration of PhD studies, or replacing the dissertation with other peer-reviewed work. This is an intriguing result, given ongoing debate within several disciplines about the purpose and value of the PhD dissertation in achieving the goals of the degree (Anderson, 1961;Monaghan, 1989). A comprehensive survey of graduate schools in Europe by the UK Council for Graduate Education (1998) found that approximately half of universities in the UK have a second set of regulations for the award of the degree of PhD, which allow the candidate's thesis to consist entirely or largely of published work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%