2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of investments efficiency of SO scrubber installation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to comply, the choice between using the more expensive low-sulphur fuels or the installation of a scrubber depends largely on the price difference between both, low-sulphur fuels and common heavy fuels [12]. Depending on the conditions, the scrubber installation costs are found to be recouped within the span of 1-2 years [13,14]. The number of scrubbers is predicted to continue to increase after the implementation of the more restrictive global sulphur cap in 2020.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to comply, the choice between using the more expensive low-sulphur fuels or the installation of a scrubber depends largely on the price difference between both, low-sulphur fuels and common heavy fuels [12]. Depending on the conditions, the scrubber installation costs are found to be recouped within the span of 1-2 years [13,14]. The number of scrubbers is predicted to continue to increase after the implementation of the more restrictive global sulphur cap in 2020.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the high difficulty in predicting trends in fuel prices (due to their volatility 13,23 ) leads to an increase in the uncertainty level. Therefore, the current results (see Table 2) and the performances obtained (see Figure 3) are insufficient to help draw broader conclusions about the suitability of the possible propulsion plants for MoS fleets operating in an ECA regulation context.…”
Section: Application and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 This involves the consideration of all the cost items related to the maritime transport ( CT c , ∀ c ∈ C , see Appendix 1), which are dependent on the technical and operative features of the fleets. The selection of the propulsion plant has special relevance due to the cost of its installation 21 ), maintenance, 14,22 possible reduction of the cargo capacity 23 and consumption costs (unitary costs of the fuels).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the annual performance deterioration rate of the scrubber is assumed as 10% in this study. In addition, according to the test result of Panasiuk and Turkina [50], the reduction rate of a scrubber for the PM emitted from the diesel main engine is 60~85%, and the SOx reduction rate is 90~98%. The PM and SOx reduction rates after the ship is equipped with a scrubber are taken as averaged values of 73% and 94%, respectively.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%